| 期刊簡介 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
期刊名稱 | TREE PHYSIOLOGY LetPub Score 7.9
50 ratings
Rate
Reputation 8.8 Influence 6.8 Speed 8.9 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 期刊簡稱 | TREE PHYSIOL | ||||||||||||||||||||
| ISSN | 0829-318X | ||||||||||||||||||||
| E-ISSN | 1758-4469 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| h-index | 117 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| CiteScore |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| 自引率 (2023-2024) | 5.70%自引率趨勢 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 掲載範囲 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| 官方網站 | https://academic.oup.com/treephys | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 在線稿件提交 | http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tp | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 開放訪問 | No | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 出版商 | Oxford University Press | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 主題領域 | 农林科学 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 出版國/地區 | CANADA | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 發行頻率 | 月刊 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 創刊年 | 1986 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 每年文章數 | 146每年文章數趨勢 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 黃金OA百分比 | 23.41% | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Web of Science 四分位 ( 2023-2024) | WOS Quartile: Q1
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| 索引 (SCI or SCIE) | Science Citation Index Science Citation Index Expanded | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 鏈接到PubMed Central (PMC) | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0829-318X%5BISSN%5D | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 平均審稿時間 * | 來自出版商的數據: 來自作者的數據: Sort of slow, 6-12 Week(s) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 競爭力 * | 來自作者的數據: Difficult | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 參考鏈接 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| *所有的審稿過程指標,如接受率和審稿速度,僅限於用戶提交的稿件。因此,這些指標可能無法準確反映期刊的競爭力或速度。 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
| |
| 首頁 上一頁 1 2 下一頁 末頁 (頁 | |
| [TREE PHYSIOLOGY] 的評論 | 撰寫評論 |
| 作者: 孙晓威 領域: 农林科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-09-29 15:12:01 評論於 Submitted for review in around 40 days. |
| 作者: yu 領域: 农林科学 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-09-28 18:55:38 評論於 It should be under review. May I ask how long it took for you to reach this status? |
| 作者: 孙晓威 領域: 农林科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-09-11 16:43:37 評論於 Has the review been under review? |
| 作者: 氮循环 領域: 农林科学 審稿時間: 3.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2026-04-02 06:06:49 評論於 The avant-garde categorizes tree physiology into the second area of forestry, but it's optional, a local company. |
| 作者: 努力上进的PhD 領域: 农林科学 審稿時間: 4.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2026-03-27 17:33:05 評論於 It's getting better and better, even Small Forestry has dropped to the second tier. |
| 作者: joshxu 領域: 农林科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-02-10 12:30:34 評論於 The external audit has been ongoing for 5 months now, and we still don't know the results. |
| 作者: 叶子 領域: 农林科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-02-02 12:54:30 評論於 I have been awaiting editorial board assignment since January 12th, and it is still the same on February 2nd. What's going on? |
| 作者: 小苗苗 領域: 农林科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-01-25 08:59:37 評論於 It has been over 10 days since awaiting EIC assignment, so slow. |
| 作者: 氮循环 領域: 农林科学 審稿時間: 3.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2025-05-13 09:29:52 評論於 Back to the top in 2025, what's going on? |
| 作者: Jack-wang 領域: 农林科学 審稿時間: 3.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2025-04-30 16:20:46 評論於 Yes, it is recognized by industry peers during the peer review process. |
| 作者: Jack-wang 領域: 农林科学 審稿時間: 3.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2025-04-30 16:16:14 評論於 Although it is mixed up in the second category, colleagues all agree. In a word, excellence is still excellence, and classics are still classics. |
| 作者: Hui-Min Wang 領域: 环境科学与生态学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-04-26 20:30:09 評論於 How many reviewers are there? |
| 作者: Li 大胆 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 3.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2025-04-23 14:06:36 評論於 Submitted on January 17, 2025, the manuscript was received for review on March 23 after the Chinese New Year. A revision was requested on April 3, and the revised manuscript was accepted on April 18. The entire process took three months from start to finish. |
| 作者: jiangz~y 領域: 农林科学 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 拒稿 撰寫評論 |
2025-04-07 10:19:56 評論於 The editor rejected it, so it did not enter the review process. |
| 作者: 好运0302 領域: 农林科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-04-01 19:19:44 評論於 How are you now? What's your status? |
| 作者: 氮循环 領域: 农林科学 審稿時間: 3.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2025-03-24 18:22:40 評論於 Domestic journals are not easy to submit, they are rejected instantly! |
| 作者: passion_43 領域: 农林科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-03-21 09:30:45 評論於 Looking at the 2025 rankings, it is truly unbelievable that journals like Forest Ecology and Management and Tree Physiology, which are considered second-tier publications, are ranked as first-tier journals above Forest Ecosystems and Journal of Forestry Research. |
| 作者: jiangz~y 領域: 农林科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-03-06 10:25:26 評論於 Awaiting Editorial Board Assignment for over 10 days. |
| 作者: 马哥 領域: 农林科学 審稿時間: 3.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2025-02-26 09:52:54 評論於 Submission in early June 2024, it wasn't until mid-July that all reviewers were gathered. Rejected and resubmitted in early September 2024. Revised and resubmitted in early December 2024 (delayed due to personal reasons). Minor revisions by the end of January 2025. Revised and resubmitted in early February 2025. Accepted in mid-February 2025. In the field of tree physiology and ecology, Tree Physiology is a well-established and respected journal among professionals. I saw a statement on Zhihu that I agree with: Question: How did Tree Physiology become a second-tier journal? Answer: Because the Chinese Academy of Sciences Literature and Information Center is messing around. The top journals in the field of forestry should be these three, with lower impact factors compared to biochemistry and materials science: 1. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology; 2. Tree Physiology; 3. Forest Ecology and Management. Articles from these journals are highly recognized by peers both domestically and internationally, and are considered valuable assets when seeking employment. |
| 作者: 老鹰不会飞 領域: 农林科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-12-31 11:53:34 評論於 So fast! The review was completed in just 2 weeks? |
| 作者: 老鹰不会飞 領域: 农林科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-12-31 11:52:20 評論於 I am also awaiting reviewer selection now. How long did you wait at that time? |
| 作者: 氮循环 領域: 农林科学 審稿時間: 3.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2024-12-02 08:27:44 評論於 Top is no longer, tree physiology thus falls. |
| 作者: 罗小罗 領域: 环境科学与生态学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-07-22 13:59:02 評論於 How long does it take for "awaiting reviewer selection"? |
| 作者: narzy 領域: 农林科学 審稿時間: 5.0 month(s) 結果: 直接被接受 撰寫評論 |
2024-04-29 16:48:02 評論於 Looking at articles from recent years, it's not unfair for TP to drop to the second tier. Some articles are indeed quite good, but many lack originality and are of average quality |
| 作者: passion_43 領域: 农林科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-01-03 10:02:09 評論於 Isn't it obvious that there are only two first-tier forestry journals this year? One is Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, and the other is a domestic journal on Forest ecosystems. The former deserves its first-tier status, while everyone knows very well how the latter managed to secure its first-tier position |
| 首頁 上一頁 1 2 下一頁 末頁 (頁 | |
Contact us