Bro, are there usually two reviewers?

(0) 讚！ | 园田真理老公

Bro, do you only have two experts reviewing the manuscript?

(0) 讚！ | 园田真理老公

Submitted on December 4, 2024;
Received editorial comments on December 10, 2024;
Resubmitted on December 25, 2024;
Received reviewer comments on April 28, 2025;
Submitted revised manuscript on May 22, 2025;
Accepted on May 31, 2025, totaling nearly 7 months.

The second article "Wear" was accepted, but still as slow as ever.
The manuscript was only reviewed by the editor for a week, with fewer editorial comments this time, but had to be resubmitted due to issues with the submission system.
After resubmission, a lot of time was spent on finding reviewers, with the second reviewer taking a long time to provide feedback.
Eventually, a third reviewer was found, and both reviewers' feedback was mostly positive. The revised manuscript was submitted three weeks later, and accepted 10 days after that.
This time, the editor was Dr. Martin Dienwiebel, who had previously reviewed several manuscripts submitted by him as a reviewer. This editor was relatively more relaxed in comparison.

(0) 讚！ | joe zhang

Submitted on January 2nd, the initial review by the editor was done on January 20th, with some suggestions provided. After submitting in February, the manuscript underwent a two-month review process, with minor revisions made before being accepted for publication. The editor is very responsible, but the review process is relatively long.

(0) 讚！ | alinging

Hello, may I ask if your article is related to wear or erosion of coatings?

(0) 讚！ | 吃柠檬的小毛桃

Over four months with the editor, inquired four times, with no response or changes.

(0) 讚！ | 彩壳

According to the comments of the reviewers, we have replied point by point, mainly expressing the possibility of revisions and the unreasonable demands of the reviewers. The editing team is still good, as long as the changes are reasonable, the chances of success are high.

(0) 讚！ | Yang@2021

I am truly fed up, it's been almost half a year since I submitted my work and there has been no response. It's been a terrible submission experience.

(0) 讚！ | halloly

Hello, may I ask how can I file an appeal with you?

(0) 讚！ | Zhaohuan Pang

Insert the image into the text.

(0) 讚！ | 吃柠檬的小毛桃

Could you please explain why it is mentioned that my hand-drawn images and tables should not appear at the beginning and end? Aren't we supposed to upload each image separately? Also, my hand-drawn images and tables are not even together, so why is this being mentioned as an issue?

(0) 讚！ | Hu00964

4.7 submission
On 4.11, it was mentioned that the manuscript was rejected in the technical review due to issues with the figures, and it was resubmitted. As of now, it is still submitted to the journal.

(0) 讚！ | 小左i

Just don't work, so anxious.

(0) 讚！ | 吃柠檬的小毛桃

I have been submitting my work for ten days, but I haven't received any feedback.

(0) 讚！ | 冷暖双剑

During the 3 months and 7 days with the editor, I inquired twice but still no progress.

(0) 讚！ | 彩壳

No, my manuscript has been with the editor for almost a month, and then under review for over four months without any updates...

(0) 讚！ | halloly

How long has it been since I submitted it? My two-month-old work is still in the hands of the editor.

(0) 讚！ | 吃柠檬的小毛桃

Excuse me, have you been submitted for 4 months? Mine has been submitted for two months and is still in the hands of the editor. This speed is really unacceptably slow.

(0) 讚！ | 吃柠檬的小毛桃

This paper has been under review for 4 months and has not been completed yet. What's going on...

(0) 讚！ | halloly

Does this district still have any reference significance? Nano Letters is already in the second district. Now, there is really no need to pretend anymore. They have come up with some kind of surpassing index, but they don't dare to publish the data. It's completely like playing in their own home, playing however they want.

(0) 讚！ | 五阿哥！

It's unbelievable. Wear should be the leading journal among the top three friction journals. I really don't understand how it became a second-tier top journal. The quality is also good. Personally, I think the quality of the articles is not lower than the other two top friction journals.

(0) 讚！ | w

I just want to ask, do the people who came up with this Chinese Academy of Sciences division really not laugh at themselves?
How to understand this second division, but top journals?
The people who are in charge of the Chinese Academy of Sciences division, do business openly and fairly, stop hiding and pretending to be fair.
Everyone else is 25% in one division, but you are only in the top 5%.
Even journals like Wear are only in the second division, while certain journals that are completely from domestic teams and have surface-level articles are in the top division.

(1) 讚！ | 一只能

When did you submit the manuscript? It was indeed slow.

(0) 讚！ | 五阿哥！

It has been 65 days and it's still we.

(0) 讚！ | 彩壳

It has been two days since submitting to WE, when will we be able to wait for the next status?

(0) 讚！ | 五阿哥！