Insert the image into the text.

(0) 讚！ | 吃柠檬的小毛桃

Could you please explain why it is mentioned that my hand-drawn images and tables should not appear at the beginning and end? Aren't we supposed to upload each image separately? Also, my hand-drawn images and tables are not even together, so why is this being mentioned as an issue?

(0) 讚！ | Hu00964

4.7 submission
On 4.11, it was mentioned that the manuscript was rejected in the technical review due to issues with the figures, and it was resubmitted. As of now, it is still submitted to the journal.

(0) 讚！ | 小左i

Just don't work, so anxious.

(0) 讚！ | 吃柠檬的小毛桃

I have been submitting my work for ten days, but I haven't received any feedback.

(0) 讚！ | 冷暖双剑

During the 3 months and 7 days with the editor, I inquired twice but still no progress.

(0) 讚！ | 彩壳

No, my manuscript has been with the editor for almost a month, and then under review for over four months without any updates...

(0) 讚！ | halloly

How long has it been since I submitted it? My two-month-old work is still in the hands of the editor.

(0) 讚！ | 吃柠檬的小毛桃

Excuse me, have you been submitted for 4 months? Mine has been submitted for two months and is still in the hands of the editor. This speed is really unacceptably slow.

(0) 讚！ | 吃柠檬的小毛桃

This paper has been under review for 4 months and has not been completed yet. What's going on...

(0) 讚！ | halloly

Does this district still have any reference significance? Nano Letters is already in the second district. Now, there is really no need to pretend anymore. They have come up with some kind of surpassing index, but they don't dare to publish the data. It's completely like playing in their own home, playing however they want.

(0) 讚！ | 五阿哥！

It's unbelievable. Wear should be the leading journal among the top three friction journals. I really don't understand how it became a second-tier top journal. The quality is also good. Personally, I think the quality of the articles is not lower than the other two top friction journals.

(0) 讚！ | w

I just want to ask, do the people who came up with this Chinese Academy of Sciences division really not laugh at themselves?
How to understand this second division, but top journals?
The people who are in charge of the Chinese Academy of Sciences division, do business openly and fairly, stop hiding and pretending to be fair.
Everyone else is 25% in one division, but you are only in the top 5%.
Even journals like Wear are only in the second division, while certain journals that are completely from domestic teams and have surface-level articles are in the top division.

(1) 讚！ | 一只能

When did you submit the manuscript? It was indeed slow.

(0) 讚！ | 五阿哥！

It has been 65 days and it's still we.

(0) 讚！ | 彩壳

It has been two days since submitting to WE, when will we be able to wait for the next status?

(0) 讚！ | 五阿哥！

It took me more than two months to submit for review.

(0) 讚！ | 搞不定SCi

It's been a month, and nothing has changed.

(0) 讚！ | 投稿啦

How long will it take for the submission to become "with editor" after re-submitting the issues mentioned above?

(0) 讚！ | abyss

February 11th? Or January 11th?

(0) 讚！ | accept xzj

From the 11th until now, the WE has been suppressed, and even the WE dates have not changed. How much longer will this last?

(0) 讚！ | 投稿啦

Did you get the results?

(0) 讚！ | accept xzj

May I ask what the current situation is now?

(0) 讚！ | accept xzj

Have you received or submitted anything recently, from January 9th to now, February 21st? I am exhausted.

(0) 讚！ | accept xzj

May I ask, what was the final outcome?

(0) 讚！ | 吃柠檬的小毛桃