Go straight at it.

(0) 讚！ | Danm

By the way, this expert also asked me to paste the code into the article and directly state that the innovation of this article is XXXXX in the abstract. Overall, I feel it is very unprofessional and maliciously targeted.

(0) 讚！ | 胖子没有脚

I can only say that this is the most disgusting journal I have ever seen, no doubt about it. Submitted in November 2025, revised in April 2026, mainly because the experts are really incompetent. The comments were full of malice, and it would have been better to just reject the submission. It's a low-quality journal in the 4th tier, with over 200 suggestions made, each one fatal. The main focus was on adding experiments to address world-class challenges in the relevant field. Roughly estimated, it would require adding 7 major experiments, supplementing with over a dozen sets of comparison data, and including some irrelevant content. For example, the article was not about remote sensing, but the extensive comments required me to address issues like noise in remote sensing data, lighting conditions, atmosphere, and water vapor. Can the experts solve these problems? The key issue is that after making the revisions, the rejection delayed the process by half a year. My experience is just for reference. The second expert was better, but what's the point? The changes made by the first expert made my article a mess, adding dozens of figures, tables, and sets of experimental data, but the final result was still poor.

(0) 讚！ | 胖子没有脚

The first reviewer(s) was invited on December 25, 2025. It has been almost 4 months and it is still in this state. What should we do? Urgent!

(0) 讚！ | 叶舒婉

May I ask if I have to use the template provided by the journal's official website if I use LaTeX? Can I use other templates instead? I have previously submitted to Elsevier, can I directly submit my previous LaTeX submission? It is mainly because it is too troublesome to change the template.

(0) 讚！ | Melvin1018

One reviewer is very slow in responding, but their review comments are very constructive.

(0) 讚！ | 吴宗轩

Has no one accepted the invitation to be a reviewer?

(0) 讚！ | 马上下课

It's been almost a month, let's add each other as friends on WE.

(0) 讚！ | 马上下课

Ready for editorial assignment, how about you?

(0) 讚！ | 胖子没有脚

Translation: What about deep learning?

(0) 讚！ | Dimoerr

It may be a relatively niche field, and it took a lot of time to find reviewers. However, the journal always replied to emails, and the reviewers were very friendly. In the end, the paper was accepted after revisions, and I am very satisfied with it as my first SCI paper.

(0) 讚！ | MYES0622

Just checking in, it's been half a month and there has been no progress on the WE status. What should we do? 
With editor
Editor assigned
23 Nov 2025

(0) 讚！ | 马上下课

Boss, may I ask if this journal can be selected as non-OA?

(0) 讚！ | 好心作怪

Where are you?

(0) 讚！ | Dimoerr

How far have you got? Let's communicate.

(0) 讚！ | 马上下课

Mine too, add me to communicate.

(0) 讚！ | 马上下课

Just passed the technical review, waiting to be assigned to an editor separately. It's said that it will take a few weeks, it's really slow.

(0) 讚！ | 胖子没有脚

How far have you gotten?

(0) 讚！ | 马上下课

13 Nov 2025 Submission received
13 Nov 2025 Technical check.

(0) 讚！ | 胖子没有脚

Don't worry, I spent about ten days on the technical review at that time.

(0) 讚！ | Krystal

The slowest technical review took 6 days, and it's still being transferred. Sigh.

(0) 讚！ | looyim129

After three days, there was a small issue that was fixed today and submitted. Now, I have to continue waiting for the next steps.

(0) 讚！ | 王梦豪

I had been almost two weeks at that time.

(0) 讚！ | Krystal

It has been a few days since I last saw you.

(0) 讚！ | Dimoerr

How many days of technical review is more reasonable?

(1) 讚！ | 王梦豪