May I ask what specialty you are in? I am in the field of medicine, and it is incredibly slow.

(0) 讚！ | QzPenguin

Do you accept bioinformatics projects?

(0) 讚！ | 何芯慈

On May 11th, UC, it has been a month and there is still no movement. Does anyone know what's going on?

(0) 讚！ | 鸣虫虫

The third reviewer of the second review has not provided feedback for nearly 80 days. Now the system does not show "review complete" and has directly entered the "under consideration" status. Does anyone know what's going on? Could it be that a decision has been made directly?

(0) 讚！ | seagull47

Submitted two manuscripts to Nature Water, both were rejected. Eventually, they were resubmitted to Nature Communications and accepted after a 5-month review process.

(0) 讚！ | Polymer fan

Geophysical exploration technology. Try the water and make a record. Already invested for 13 days, UC.

(0) 讚！ | Harry_Yu

I spent two and a half months with the fourth reviewer, only to find out that they specialize in evaluating the effectiveness of methods. You may be in a similar situation. We also pushed for the manuscript once, but it didn't help.

(0) 讚！ | 木子先生2012

Did you send an email to the editor? How long did it take for them to reply?

(0) 讚！ | seagull47

Same question.. It has been three months for me already... The editor said they would find a new reviewer, but there has been no action taken yet...

(0) 讚！ | Gu2uMo

It has been two months since it was in the hands of the third reviewer, and the editor has not found a new reviewer. Our small research group has never been published in a sub-journal before, so I don't know if this situation is normal. Does anyone know?

(0) 讚！ | seagull47

Please ask all the big gods, will NC accept articles on engineering applications!!

(0) 讚！ | 托雅塔

The manuscript transferred from the major journal, and the review process is relatively fast. Currently, there are three reviewers assigned. Looking forward to a positive outcome.

(0) 讚！ | HDUer

I received an email notifying the reviewers the day after submitting my manuscript. Is this normal? It seems very fast.

(0) 讚！ | 地学小王

The initial review process takes 42 days, is it necessary to take so long now? Isn't the median usually 10 working days?

(0) 讚！ | xiaoyaotianxia

Submitted in early August last year, after a major revision, it was provisionally accepted in mid-March this year, followed by a 3-week spring break for the editorial department. It was officially accepted in early May. The whole process took 9 months, which was not easy. The reviewers were very professional and the editors were extremely rigorous.

(0) 讚！ | oscarkwan84

The quality of NC articles is very high, they must be innovative, they must be the kind of eye-catching novelty, rather than simply increasing workload. The editors have a sharp eye, and they can easily see through the flashy packaging that lacks novelty. In addition, comments from reviewers will be reviewed by editors, and comments that clearly have conflicts of interest will be passed over by editors. In recent years, NC and Nat Phys have increased their number of publications, and the strictness of the review process and the professionalism of the reviewers are unmatched by ordinary professional journals. Although the publication fees are also among the highest, the quality cannot be denied and it still stands out.

(1) 讚！ | 52赫兹的问候

请问您需要翻译的内容是什么呢？

(0) 讚！ | 52赫兹的问候

Please translate the following paragraph into English: 

1. 我们正在努力解决这个问题，希望能在最短的时间内找到解决方案。

(0) 讚！ | 52赫兹的问候

Submit by 2-4
Review by 2-28
Collect by 3-20
Edit and share the top three opinions by 4-16
Still waiting for the final reviewer, fingers crossed! Not sure what will happen if they bail, will the editor find another one or just go with these three?

(0) 讚！ | lestina-1

How long did you take to find the fourth reviewer for this article? Mine is the same. The first two reviewers quickly finished their reviews, but the third reviewer hasn't given any feedback in over 30 days. I'm wondering if they have also disappeared.

(0) 讚！ | seagull47

The third round was still sent to the reviewers, which is common for the Nature series. However, luckily, the newly added reviewer agreed to accept it within three days.

(0) 讚！ | 阿贾

How long did it take to find the fourth reviewer for editing?

(0) 讚！ | seagull47

It's not easy at all, the second review only requires feedback from experts #1 and #3, expert #2 has gone missing, and now we need to add another reviewer, hoping for a lenient one!!

(0) 讚！ | WWBY

Three reviewers did not identify any obvious negative comments, but one reviewer provided detailed feedback, requesting increased rigor and repeatability in the experimental results, from experiments to simulations to mechanistic analysis.

(0) 讚！ | seagull47

Have you submitted the third review, boss, or did you directly accept without submitting it for review? Accept.

(0) 讚！ | xw111