Progress update, finally officially accepted

Accept	12th September 25
Manuscript under consideration	12th September 25
Several revisions and materials provided in between
Editor Assigned	30th July 25
Manuscript submitted	30th July 25
Submission in process	29th July 25

Accept in principle	21st July 25
Manuscript under consideration	26th June 25
Review Complete	26th June 25

(1) 讚！ | zhuangzx

How many days after the formal acceptance will the proof be completed online?

(0) 讚！ | fangditto

Have you officially accepted it? How long did you wait after submitting the checklist?

(0) 讚！ | ERIC0515

The speed is considered fast. Although it took one month for the submission to be reviewed, the reviewer completed the review in 15 days. The editor requested minor revisions, which were completed within a month. The second round of reviewers agreed within two days, but it took the editor 40 days to reply with a decision of principle acceptance. They provided a Word document with a list of requested modifications and requested all raw data to be uploaded. Although the principle acceptance was granted, the formatting modifications that followed were still challenging. However, it is important to maintain a positive attitude. Wishing everyone successful acceptance.

(0) 讚！ | zhangyi

Manuscript submitted on 26th August. It has been 9 days since then and there is still no arrangement from the editor. What is going on?

(0) 讚！ | 十三豆pxm

Are you looking at Live Manuscripts or Post Manuscripts? If it's the latter, it means rejection.

(0) 讚！ | 1*2*3*

Do you guys know what's going on? Why is the status blank, is it because the review has been rejected?

(0) 讚！ | lxfa

How to say rejection, is it feedback given in about 2 weeks?

(0) 讚！ | haha

Rejected by the standard procedure.

(0) 讚！ | SJNing

I was rejected by the external audit.

(0) 讚！ | 北油沉积小陈

The journal is very good, better than the average Q1 journal.

(0) 讚！ | 北油沉积小陈

After you submit, is the External Editor column Not Assigned or Assigned?

(0) 讚！ | 1*2*3*

It's really agonizing to wait.

(0) 讚！ | SJNing

Recently, everything has been generally slow, with submissions taking 30-40 days to be reviewed. We can only wait.

(1) 讚！ | 阿贾

Is there any buddy who knows about forest ecology to give some suggestions?

(0) 讚！ | SJNing

It has been 12 days now, can any experienced friends provide some answers as to whether it can be submitted for review?

(1) 讚！ | SJNing

The rejection from the editor took 33 days, and the suggestion to submit to SR is listed below the editor's name. This must be included in the rejection letters of all Nature sub-journals. Damn, if they rejected me within a week, I wouldn't say anything, but 33 days is really outrageous.

(0) 讚！ | VingeGOD

It was submitted on August 19th and stayed in the editor's office for 40 days before being reviewed.

(0) 讚！ | 阿贾

At the Earth Science Ocean Department, I have been working for almost a year. After submitting my work, it was stuck in the hands of the editor for a month, and then was rejected with a desk rejection because it was not considered a sufficiently striking advance. I was told to submit to SR, which felt like a slap in the face followed by being spit on.

(0) 讚！ | reinkes1

I have been "under consideration" since August 5th, and it has been 15 days with no changes. Is there any recent updates within this department?

(1) 讚！ | awellatom

UC is deciding whether to submit for review.

(1) 讚！ | ZDW

Could you please confirm if "under consideration" means "under review"?

(1) 讚！ | 有何不可

Hello, I would like to ask why your submission status interface is a little different from others'?

(0) 讚！ | tangshanwei

Isn't it normal that the reviewer's opinions cannot completely resolve the issue?

(0) 讚！ | yijinsha

Are you kidding? Can the editor dare to accept the reviewer's comments?

(0) 讚！ | soldiergogogo