After submission, the status has always been "Submitted to Journal", is this correct?

(0) 讚！ | 齐稀古

May I ask how many reviewers have been invited and how many of them have accepted the review invitation? Thank you.

(0) 讚！ | Haory

Hello, after the external review of this journal, is there no way to see the review status like Elsevier?

(0) 讚！ | Haory

After seeing the comments upstairs, I chose this journal and also selected Editor Liu for review. Thank you, Editor Liu, for promptly sending the article for review. The journal is responsible and attentive, wishing everyone a successful submission. Below is a record of the submission status:
2026.02.27   Submitted
2026.03.02   With editor
2026.03.02   Under review
2026.03.31   Required Reviews Completed
2026.04.14   Revise
2026.04.27   Submitted revisions
2026.04.28   With editor
2026.04.30   Under review
2026.05.04   Accepted

(0) 讚！ | 我又买个小拖拉机

First, I sent an email to the editorial department inquiring about the status of the manuscript. After some time, I filled out a feedback form on the IJAM official website under "About the Journal-Contact IJAM". Shortly after, I received a reply email. It seems that the reviewers may have been too busy and forgot to review the manuscript, but the efficiency of the editor-in-chief is still high. If the review process takes a long time, it is polite to send a follow-up email to inquire, and then wait patiently.

(0) 讚！ | 林森

May I ask who the email was sent to? I haven't received a reply after sending it.

(0) 讚！ | 0yuyu0

It has been six and a half months since I submitted the manuscript, and I have sent emails to the chief editor and the editorial department, but have not received any response. What should I do?

(0) 讚！ | 0yuyu0

Why is it still under review for over half a year? Why doesn't the irresponsible reviewer get blacklisted?

(1) 讚！ | 翻斗花园壮壮妈

I have been submitting applications for 5 months, but haven't received any response.

(0) 讚！ | 翻斗花园壮壮妈

Super fast! From submission to acceptance, it took only 55 days.
2025-12-08 Submission
2025-01-24 First review comments returned (Revise)
2025-01-30 Revised manuscript uploaded
2026-02-01 Acceptance

(0) 讚！ | 波波大

Thank you, Professor Liu, for your high efficiency in handling the manuscript. The reason for the long UR time is mainly due to the reviewers taking a long time to review. After sending a reminder letter, the review comments were quickly returned.

(0) 讚！ | 林森

It has been half a year and I still haven't received any reply for my first review. I sent an email to inquire about the status, but there was no response.

(0) 讚！ | 林森

It is really outrageous that the reviewer accepted the submission but did not review it. It has never been this slow before when submitting here, and it has been four and a half months already without receiving any feedback.

(0) 讚！ | 翻斗花园壮壮妈

Thanks to editor-in-chief Liu Zishun, the paper was accepted in about two months from submission, very fast, a very good journal!

(0) 讚！ | QQ499122163

It's been nearly four months and we still haven't received the first-instance judgment. Outrageous.

(0) 讚！ | 翻斗花园壮壮妈

Still in UR, don't know why it's so slow.

(0) 讚！ | 翻斗花园壮壮妈

Submission on June 19, 2025;
Sent to editor on June 23, 2025;
Sent for review on June 25, 2025;
Reviewer feedback received on August 16, 2025 (contacted 3, 2 responded, all experts were quite professional);
Returned for revisions on September 12, 2025;
Editor returned with revision suggestions on September 29, 2025 (incorrect reference format);
Returned for revisions on October 11, 2025;
Editor returned with revision suggestions on October 11, 2025 (incorrect reference format);
Returned for revisions on November 6, 2025;
Editor returned with revision suggestions on November 7, 2025 (incorrect reference format);
Returned for revisions on November 11, 2025 (realized the journal's references are sorted alphabetically, spent a long time struggling with the format, didn't get it right);
Returned for revisions on November 6, 2025;
Accepted for publication on November 13, 2025.

Many thanks to Editor Liu Zishun, who was very patient and pointed out the specific issues with reference format in all three rounds of revisions.
The editor also worked quickly, my 5-month timeline was mainly due to my lack of urgency and attention to detail, otherwise it could have been faster.

(0) 讚！ | PPXuan.

10.29 Still in UR.

(0) 讚！ | 翻斗花园壮壮妈

The email will send the source file, and the PDF proof can go through many rounds.

(0) 讚！ | wzxinxin

Have you received the notification for proofreading? How is he going to proofread it?

(0) 讚！ | Chen

Exactly two months.

(0) 讚！ | wzxinxin

7.15 Submission
8.15 First round of review response
9.3 Submission of first round of review revisions
9.7 Second round of review response
9.9 Submission of second round of review revisions
9.15 Accept
Thank you, Teacher Liu, for your prompt response. The second reviewer provided 36 comments, but they are all constructive and not difficult to address.

(0) 讚！ | 王子欣

Hey classmate, have you submitted your paper for review?

(0) 讚！ | 科研冤种

9.10 sub
9.11 Editor invited
9.19 Still waiting for Editor invited
Why is it so slow

(0) 讚！ | 科研冤种

Record 
2025.09.15 STJ

(0) 讚！ | 不要拒我