Good luck!!

(0) 讚！ | 没名字。

Excuse me, is it possible to publish without layout fees?

(0) 讚！ | FFF1

After submission, the manuscript quickly went under review and feedback for minor revisions was received within 20 days. Following a second review with the editor, acceptance was granted within 7 days of the decision in principle. Thank you for the efficient editing process.

(0) 讚！ | 徊走

Please translate the following passage into English: 接接接?录用?

Please kindly accept my job offer.

(0) 讚！ | FFF1

Received, coming to fulfill the vow.

(0) 讚！ | Haodong Li

Make a wish and hope for a smooth reception.

(1) 讚！ | Haodong Li

The impact factor has dropped to 26, with a maximum of 5 points.

(0) 讚！ | cbyxykfyxk

Please translate the following passage into English: "接接接??"

(0) 讚！ | FFF1

May I ask how long it will take for the next step after with editor?

(0) 讚！ | fengnuan

How are things going on behind?

(0) 讚！ | fengnuan

With Editor 2 weeks
Decision in Process 1 day
Then returned With Editor
Does anyone know what's going on?

(0) 讚！ | 小蜗牛

First review takes 3 months, currently with editor.

(0) 讚！ | 小蜗牛

Under review for 3 months
Required reviews were completed the same day, with the editor for 1 week now.
Is it going to be rejected?

(0) 讚！ | 小蜗牛

Clicked the wrong option. Submission period is 3 months.

(0) 讚！ | 伍龙

Surgery direction, review. Submitted on April 8, 2025; Required reviews complete on April 27, 2025; Revised on May 6, 2025, with minor revisions requested before June 4, taking about 10 days to revise; Revision submitted on May 13, immediately returned, needing to upload unmarked revisions, re-upload and submit, then quickly became Under Review; Required reviews complete on June 3, 2025; Under Review on June 4, 2025, with one reviewer giving negative feedback, so a new reviewer was invited; Required reviews complete on June 15, 2025, quickly becoming With Editor; Revised on June 25, 2025, given 3 weeks for minor revisions, taking one week to resubmit; Revision submitted on July 1, 2025; With Editor on July 2, 2025; Decision In Process on July 3, 2025; Accepted on July 4, 2025. This journal's editorial process is very fast, and the reviews are quite strict, with three experts in the first round and four experts in the second round, all providing objective suggestions and feedback. Overall, very good.

(1) 讚！ | 伍龙

It's been more than ten days since I paid the layout fee for the job offer, but I still haven't received the proofreading. When will the proofreading be done?

(0) 讚！ | qxyznl

Extremely difficult.

(0) 讚！ | BD111@

Is it difficult to submit articles to this journal?

(0) 讚！ | 刘宇航

It has been almost 4 months under review, I have sent an email inquiry but received a very official reply without any status update. I would like to ask how long everyone has been under review.

(0) 讚！ | 白龙77

The minor revisions in the first review were accepted and the manuscript was directly accepted after revision. Overall, the submission process went smoothly. There were no multiple rounds of revisions as mentioned online, leading to direct rejection.

(1) 讚！ | 核弹发射井

That's right, if the direction is not suitable, you should reject the editing review, and then reject it again for this reason when it is returned for revision. It is indeed a waste of half a year.

(0) 讚！ | 萧锦铉

Did you experience any continuous changes in WE and DIP at that time?

(0) 讚！ | Yun888

Update
2.23 RRC
Then UR
3.11 RRC
Major revisions requested 20 minutes later
3.23 Revision submitted
Format issues raised on the same day and sent back
3.24 Submitted, with editor on the same day
UR on 3.25
4.2 RRC
With editor 20 minutes later
Decision in process on the same day
With editor again over an hour later
4.4 Consulted the editorial team today and learned that the final decision will be made by the EIC (with EIC for final decision)
Requesting acceptance.

(0) 讚！ | Yun888

No reason for rejection...just a direct rejection, claiming that the reviewer's opinion is not final.

(0) 讚！ | oopd1

It all depends on the editor's mood, the opinions of the reviewers are irrelevant. What's funny is that even if the reviewers are satisfied, if the editor is not, that cannot be used as a reason for revision. Reviewers' satisfactory comments. Submit - minor revisions - reject. It's a waste of six months for nothing.

(0) 讚！ | oopd1