We should switch from the EM submission system to Springer. No wonder the response has been slow recently, and the old system is no longer available for submissions.

(0) 讚！ | wangshuo998

In the past six months, I don't know if this magazine has stopped publishing. I have submitted several articles one after another, but all of them are stuck and there is no response to my emails.

(0) 讚！ | wangshuo998

Why is it taking so long? It's been three months and the editor is still assigned.

(1) 讚！ | Lucas

The application submitted on May 15 is still under review.

(0) 讚！ | winnie6666

Hello, my second review has been going on for 4 months so far, and it has always been in the assigned to reviewer status. Is yours the same?

(0) 讚！ | 张多猫

Hello, my second review has been going on for 4 months now, and it has been in the status of being assigned to reviewers. Is yours the same?

(0) 讚！ | 张多猫

I am also in the same situation. I returned for revisions on August 15th and it has been 4 months now, still in the status of "reviewer assigned." How have you all been dealing with it?

(0) 讚！ | 张多猫

I have been searching for reviewers for several months but still haven't found any. I wonder why they have suddenly become so unpopular.

(0) 讚！ | wangshuo998

I submitted my article on 8.30 and the reviewers were assigned on 9.23. The status has not changed since then.

(0) 讚！ | yinyu

Submitted on 8.26.
Editor Assigned on 8.29.
Rejected on 10.21, not within the scope of inclusion...

(0) 讚！ | bella009

Simply read the abstract and conclusion to determine how much of your content has already been published; organize and submit to journals with lower Impact Factors than those that have already been published

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Research Purpose, Process, and Results: The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of social media on teenagers' mental health. The research process involved conducting surveys and interviews with teenagers to collect data on their social media usage and mental well-being. The results showed a correlation between excessive social media usage and increased levels of anxiety and depression among teenagers.

Discussion of Data Results: The findings of this study are consistent with previous research which has also reported a negative relationship between social media use and mental health. For example, a study conducted by Smith et al. (2018) found that adolescents who spent more time on social media had higher levels of loneliness and lower self-esteem.

Evaluation and Discussion of Research Contribution and Significance: This research contributes to the growing body of literature on the effects of social media on mental health, especially among teenagers. By highlighting the potential negative consequences of excessive social media use, this study emphasizes the importance of promoting healthy online habits among young people.

Future Research Directions: Moving forward, it will be important to further explore the underlying mechanisms that link social media use to mental health outcomes. Additionally, longitudinal studies could help determine the long-term impact of social media on teenagers' well-being

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

How to Write a Discussion?

(0) 讚！ | 陶宜三岁啦

What to do if experimental data is published ahead of time?

(2) 讚！ | 北国博达

How long does it take from acceptance to online?

(0) 讚！ | 八坂又亦

Writing a letter of appeal? How can this be done? yang345 posted on 2016-02-17 Research direction: neonates; clinical; Acceptance rate: approximately 75% Review time: about 6 months SCI (2014): 1.523 Submitted a clinical paper, initially rejected, but later accepted after writing a letter of appeal

(0) 讚！ | 冬马昆雄

Review speed: 3.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 50.0
Experience sharing: Italian Journal of Pediatrics: The journal does not charge a review fee, but charges a page fee (1240 pounds per article. The journal provides an invoice, which incurs an additional 50 pounds, and a 200 yuan bank transfer fee for China). The journal received the submission on May 9, and immediately sent out the proof, which was online the next day. The speed from acceptance to online is very fast! The opinions in each round are as follows: Major Revision, Major Revision, Major Revision, Minor Revision, Accept.
09 May 2016 Editor Decision - Accept
22 Apr 2016 AU - Author Revision
22 Apr 2016 AU - PDF Built
20 Apr 2016 Editor Decision - Minor Revision
12 Apr 2016 AU - Author Revision
12 Apr 2016 AU - PDF Built
01 Apr 2016 Editor Decision - Major Revision
06 Mar 2016 AU - Author Revision
06 Mar 2016 AU - PDF Built
06 Mar 2016 AU - PDF Built
02 Mar 2016 AU - Remind author before due date
05 Feb 2016 Editor Decision - Major Revision
30 Dec 2015 AU - Author Approves Changes
30 Dec 2015 AU - PDF Built
29 Dec 2015 AU - Return Submission after Technical Check
26 Dec 2015 AU - Author Revision
26 Dec 2015 AU - PDF Built
23 Dec 2015 AU - Remind author before due date
10 Oct 2015 Ad Hoc from Author to Editorial Office ijp@biomedcentral.com
27 Sep 2015 Editor Decision - Major Revision
09 Jul 2015 AU - Inform author of MS ID
07 Jul 2015 AU - Author Approves Changes
07 Jul 2015 AU - PDF Built
07 Jul 2015 AU - PDF Built
07 Jul 2015 AU - Return Submission after Technical Check
06 Jul 2015 AU - Author Submission
06 Jul 2015 AU - PDF Built

(0) 讚！ | Isabel Raman

Review speed: 6.0 | Submission success rate: 75.0
Experience sharing: Submitted a clinical paper, initially rejected, but later accepted after appealing

(0) 讚！ | Colby Craigie