July 22, 2025, submitted to the journal
July 26, 2025, awaiting reviewer selection
June 29, 2025, awaiting reviewer invitation
June 29, 2025, awaiting reviewer assignment

(0) 讚！ | victoria123

Are you going to start charging now?

(0) 讚！ | 晨夏微凉

How long do we have to wait for the EIC decision?

(0) 讚！ | 007

It's been four days since submission, and the editor has not been assigned yet. Does this mean it's over?

(0) 讚！ | 蛋壳蛋壳蛋壳壳

June 12, 2025, submitted to the journal
June 16, 2025, awaiting reviewer selection
June 21, 2025, awaiting reviewer invitation
June 21, 2025, awaiting reviewer assignment
Wishing for good luck.

(0) 讚！ | 三羧酸循环

Always in the Awaiting Editorial Office Processing stage, no editor assigned yet. How long does this stage last?

(0) 讚！ | accept lucky

The submission was made in mid-March 2025, and it took about a week for the review process. In late April, the reviewer's comments were received, all of which were positive. The revisions were made in mid-May, and by the end of May, the paper was accepted. The whole process took about two and a half months, not too fast nor too slow. Thanks to Editor Yafei Zhang and the reviewers!

(0) 讚！ | jqxky

Thank you.

(0) 讚！ | 007

Thank you, OP.

(0) 讚！ | 007

It seems like nobody has gone through a complete submission process, so I will share a complete one for reference (note that ED is responsible for editing, and EIC is the editor-in-chief),
Currently in the process of revision, the journal review process is really fast! Thanks to the editor and reviewers for their quick response~
2025 0401 submitted to journal
2025 0406 awaiting reviewer selection
2025 0408 awaiting reviewer scores
2025 0419 awaiting ED recommendation
2025 0426 awaiting EIC decision
2025 0429 Major Revision
(If there are rejection comments during the review, it will be rejected directly at ED recommendation. If ED takes a few days and it reaches awaiting EIC decision, it is very likely to be revised~)

(2) 讚！ | Dididi~

The reason you can't succeed might be your own problem.

(0) 讚！ | sdxsa

How long does it take for the big shots to make a decision? I still haven't received the result of my awaiting EIC decision after a week.

(0) 讚！ | 勤劳的小蜜蜂凹

Encountered vicious competition among peers.

(0) 讚！ | 睿智先生

Hired after modification

(0) 讚！ | 卑微小王

The submission was made on December 3, 2024, and was rejected on December 30, 2024. Five reviewers provided feedback, three of which suggested minor revisions. The work was deemed interesting by the reviewers, but ultimately rejected by the editor. After making the revisions, the manuscript was resubmitted, but was rejected by the editor in March 2025.

(0) 讚！ | 江科大杨博士

Please also ask the original poster, how did things develop afterwards?

(0) 讚！ | 穷凶极恶

Is a journal with a 100% review ratio in Chemical Reviews also a garbage journal?

(0) 讚！ | 科研小瓦罐

After you finish your rating, will it show "under review" when you submit for approval?

(0) 讚！ | S.Tow

Can I ask, what is the status of your application? Mine has just entered the evaluation stage, is there a high chance of rejection?

(0) 讚！ | S.Tow

The processing speed is very fast, with a one-week review period, and feedback from the first round of review is returned within two weeks. All four reviewers are experts in the field, and the feedback is quickly accepted after it is received.

(0) 讚！ | 蝴蝶结和橡皮筋

Can't agree more. Trash journal.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名投稿

This is the same garbage as bioactive materials, both are niche journals, don't bother if no one cares.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名投稿

Please translate the following passage into English: 1

(0) 讚！ | SCI 不分区

The chief editor processes very quickly, which is commendable. Here is the submission timeline:
2025.1.11 awaiting editor processing
2025.1.15 awaiting reviewer selection
2025.1.17 awaiting reviewer assignment
2025.1.18 awaiting reviewer scores
2025.2.3 awaiting editor recommendation
2025.2.6 Rejected by three reviewers, two for minor revisions and one for rejection (reason given was lack of innovation, along with a few other minor issues, two of which were incorrect and two were common knowledge in the field). The chief editor ultimately decided to reject the submission. That same day, an appeal letter of 15 pages was written to the chief editor, but no response was received within a week (possibly due to us being an unknown small research group in China).

(0) 讚！ | SCI 不分区

Do you also say "nature" like this?

(0) 讚！ | 科研小瓦罐