After being rejected for five months, revised three times, and approved by the reviewers, the final editor used AI for review, which had no logical reasoning. The paper was rejected inexplicably before being revised again. Even prestigious journals are like this, so beware and be cautious.

(1) 讚！ | 欧根

Xiaobai is still very sad and lost.

(0) 讚！ | zsl12

I must say. The international public database (ethics are also clearly stated). Submitted on November 24, 2024, reviewed by four reviewers, revised on January 23, 2025, resubmitted on January 30, 2025, and rejected on February 27, 2025. The reason for rejection was stated as, "concerns about access to American databases, data analysis, presentation of results, manuscript content, and ethical issues were considered unsuitable for publication as original research articles. Please note that all research conducted by academic or clinical institutions' authors must be reviewed and approved by their institutions before the start of the research." This was the opinion of the final reviewer, who raised some issues with the reference format during the revision process. I feel that if a manuscript is to be rejected due to ethical reasons, it should be rejected at the first review, rather than asking for revisions and wasting time.

(0) 讚！ | 赵世莉

Please give more review suggestions so that he can optimize it properly. ?

(0) 讚！ | Adelaide Lawson

After my first revision, I waited for four months before seeking another reviewer for feedback. It has been another month since I resubmitted the revised version, but it has not been sent back to the reviewer yet. This journal is terrible, with extremely slow processing times and no responses to emails.

(0) 讚！ | Truman Middleton

The magazine has already sent the manuscript to the reviewers, but the reviewers have not yet accepted the review.

(0) 讚！ | 玉萧松胜

2024-9-16 Evaluation requests sent to reviewers. 2024-10-23 Still in this status, what's going on, comrades?

(0) 讚！ | 艺菲baby

How should we understand the "awaiting decision" status?

(0) 讚！ | 聚目的鹰

I specialize in the field of urology, immunology, and other surgical specialties. If you have any articles related to these areas, please feel free to send me a private message before submitting them for publication.

(0) 讚！ | 玉萧松胜

What is your email address? I can recommend you as a reviewer, thank you.

(0) 讚！ | 魔都鸿雪

Is this for real? Can you really do this?

(0) 讚！ | 螳螂若山

May I ask how much the similarity rate needs to be reduced to?

(0) 讚！ | 可欣小仙女

Research focus: Medicine; Clinical research; Sharing of clinical experience: I am a reviewer for this journal, and the journal gives reviewers 10 days to complete the review. As long as I am not busy with clinical work, I usually complete the review and submit it on the same day. This is because I often experience long submission times myself.

(0) 讚！ | 玉萧松胜

$2800

(0) 讚！ | 思娜郎

Review speed: 1.0 | Submission hit rate: 75.0 Emphasis on research direction: Clinical experience sharing: I have reviewed several articles for this journal, some of which were really poorly done and still submitted for review, which is unbelievable. I have never submitted any articles myself, but I am often asked to review them. I generally do not reject articles, but try to provide as much feedback as possible for the editors to make a decision. The overall review speed should be quite fast, as I usually submit within a week.

(0) 讚！ | 上清明喆

What's up, brother?

(0) 讚！ | Ralap Field

Hello, may I ask how much is your page charge? I saw there are aurthors publication fee and express publication fee

(0) 讚！ | Ed Butler

Hello, may I ask how much your layout fee is?

(0) 讚！ | Ed Butler

Focus on clinical work, strive to publish papers, and work hard on research projects!

(0) 讚！ | 孤云世祥

I also want to know what magazine this is??

(0) 讚！ | 八卦殿章

Review speed: 3.0 | Submission hit rate: 50.0 Weighted research direction: Obstetrics and Gynecology; Critical Care Experience Sharing: After three full months, the editor's attitude was very good, and responses to internal messages were received within one day. From the reviewer's feedback, it can be seen that they may not be medical professionals in a specialized field (possibly academic researchers), their grasp of professional knowledge is relatively loose, but their control over the overall design and statistics is relatively strict, and they are very meticulous in their checks, even picking up on the slightest mistakes. The first revision required three people to spend a whole week collecting additional data. The second revision only involved changing two words, and my revised submission was accepted within 10 minutes~ 

2024-04-11 Accepted - invoice issued
2024-04-11 1st Post-Rev plagiarism check ready
2024-04-11 Sent for 1st Post-Rev antiplagiarism check
2024-04-11 Ready for Post-Rev antiplagiarism check
2024-04-11 After authors corrections
2024-04-11 Sent to author(s) for corrections (1 week)
2024-04-11 Reconsider after revision

(0) 讚！ | 太虚嘉兴

Review Speed: 1.0 | Submission Hit Rate: 75.0
Research Focus: Clinical Research; Research Experience Sharing: 2024-03-12 Rejected
2024-03-12 Review - rejected
2024-03-11 Awaiting decision
2024-03-11 2nd Scientific Triage Completed
2024-03-11 In 2nd Scientific triage
2024-02-29 Review pending
2024-02-29 Evaluation requests sent to reviewers
2024-02-28 Scientific triage completed
2024-02-28 In scientific triage
2024-02-28 Manuscript accepted for processing
2024-02-28 Plagiarism check (submission) 1 ready
2024-02-28 Sent for anti-plagiarism verification
2024-02-28 Submissions Approved
2024-02-27 Submission Received

(0) 讚！ | 思娜郎

Submission hit rate: 95.0
Research focus: Clinical research experience sharing
2023-10-25Paid
2023-10-24Accepted - invoice issued
2023-10-241st Post-Rev plagiarism check ready
2023-10-24Sent for 1st Post-Rev antiplagiarism check
2023-10-24Ready for Post-Rev antiplagiarism check
2023-10-24Awaiting decision
2023-10-23Review 2 pending
2023-10-23Review 2 requests sent to reviewers
2023-10-21After authors corrections
2023-10-09Sent to author(s) for corrections (2 weeks)
2023-10-09Reconsider after revision
2023-10-09Awaiting decision
2023-10-092nd Scientific Triage Completed
2023-10-09In 2nd Scientific triage
2023-10-06Review pending
2023-10-03Evaluation requests sent to reviewers
2023-09-23Review pending
2023-08-31Evaluation requests sent to reviewers
2023-08-29Scientific triage completed
2023-08-29In scientific triage
2023-08-29Manuscript accepted for processing
2023-08-28Plagiarism check (submission) 1 ready
2023-08-28Sent for anti-plagiarism verification
2023-08-28Submissions Approved
2023-08-28Submission Received

(0) 讚！ | 思娜郎

I didn't need it at the time

(0) 讚！ | 思娜郎

I am online and in a hurry. Can you please tell me what journal Clinical Practice Review and Meta-Analysis is? I couldn't find it on PubMed or Web of Science

(0) 讚！ | 一只子轩呀