It has been over three months now and there is still no sign of any movement.

(0) 讚！ | 无望9988

Today is still under review, so please be patient. The results may not be available even after I graduate.

(0) 讚！ | 无望9988

How are you feeling ?

(0) 讚！ | wzypuppy

About two months.

(0) 讚！ | dixinyu

I want to know how long it takes for the first review of this journal.
Submitted on July 5, 2026
Under review since July 5, 2026
The status has not changed so far, and I don't know when I will receive any news.

(0) 讚！ | outlier

Hello, how long does it take for the result of your second review to be given?

(0) 讚！ | wzypuppy

I'll also wait for the second trial time. ?

(0) 讚！ | wzypuppy

The article has already been sent back for revisions. How long will the second round of review for this journal take? I heard it is slower than the first round. The first round took about forty days.

(1) 讚！ | wzypuppy

I was also a first reviewer for three months for this journal. It really depends on the speed of the reviewers. I feel that the handling speed of the editor-in-chief is still quite fast.

(0) 讚！ | dixinyu

I submitted my article on April 14th, it's been three months and there has been no response at all. I have no idea what's going on. I envy the host for being so quick. Whether it's rejected or accepted, there hasn't been any notice.

(0) 讚！ | 小于2025

The first-instance trial resulted in a verdict approximately one month later, with a duration of 7 days.

(0) 讚！ | fjcyue007

Teacher, how long does it usually take for you to give the results of the first review?

(0) 讚！ | wzypuppy

The paper has been published, and overall, the journal feels very fast in reviewing. With only around 60 papers published in a year, it's too few.

(0) 讚！ | fjcyue007

What does it mean when this journal says "大u大r" for the first time? Has it been submitted for review? When it says "under review" at the beginning, is it the editor conducting an internal review? The editors of this journal are very meticulous, they will carefully review your manuscript first, and if there are obvious problems, it may be rejected after some time.

(0) 讚！ | fjcyue007

Under review for 13 days, it should be ready for external review. I missed a round of revisions and didn't respond directly, it seems the editor contacted me on the fifth day and asked me to email it directly to him so he could upload it to the system. I think it will take about a week for the editor to handle it.

(1) 讚！ | fjcyue007

It has been 13 days under review. Can you tell me if it is being reviewed by the editor or has it been sent for external review?

(0) 讚！ | 还得努力

May I ask what does "大u大r" mean in the first issue of this journal? Has it been submitted for review?

(0) 讚！ | LEO2480

On May 8th, around 12:30 noon today, I submitted the revised manuscript. In the afternoon, around 5 o'clock, they sent an email asking me to send the latex file again, but they did not mention that the paper was accepted. In the evening, around 8 o'clock, they sent me an email saying that the paper has been accepted. The sequence of events is really strange.

(0) 讚！ | fjcyue007

Please revise the fifth round on May 7th, abbreviate phrases, follow the reference format, and submit the paper to the journal.

(0) 讚！ | fjcyue007

The notice on May 4th asked for a fourth round of revisions. The reviewer said that he didn't need to review it again this time. I think he may have grown tired of it, so it's just a few minor formatting changes. The reviewer is too meticulous.

(0) 讚！ | fjcyue007

The submission was made again on March 13th and on March 18th, I received an email saying that the point-to-point response file was missing. I was asked to resend it separately to expedite the review process. I sent it back on the same day. I remember that I had uploaded it in the system, but I don't know why the system lost it. This submission and revision system requires the point-to-point response file to be uploaded twice. After a long review process, I received the third round of revision emails on April 13th. The first two rounds were major revisions, with one reviewer accepting the first round revisions immediately after review, while the same reviewer continued to ask for revisions in the second and third rounds. The third round was minor revisions, focusing on correcting some minor writing errors. I uploaded the revisions on April 16th, paying special attention to uploading the point-to-point response file. I am now waiting to see what the fourth round of review will bring. The editors and reviewers of this journal are particularly rigorous.

(0) 讚！ | fjcyue007

I was about three months old at that time.

(1) 讚！ | dixinyu

Hello, may I ask how long it takes for the first review results to come out for this journal? I submitted on January 18th and it is still under review.

(0) 讚！ | 晴天

Please translate the following passage into English: 111

(0) 讚！ | dixinyu

On February 7th, the revised draft was returned, and on February 28th, the second review came back. One person received it, and another person used AI to review the manuscript and torture me.

(0) 讚！ | fjcyue007