The first-instance trial resulted in a verdict approximately one month later, with a duration of 7 days.

(0) 讚！ | fjcyue007

Teacher, how long does it usually take for you to give the results of the first review?

(0) 讚！ | wzypuppy

The paper has been published, and overall, the journal feels very fast in reviewing. With only around 60 papers published in a year, it's too few.

(0) 讚！ | fjcyue007

What does it mean when this journal says "大u大r" for the first time? Has it been submitted for review? When it says "under review" at the beginning, is it the editor conducting an internal review? The editors of this journal are very meticulous, they will carefully review your manuscript first, and if there are obvious problems, it may be rejected after some time.

(0) 讚！ | fjcyue007

Under review for 13 days, it should be ready for external review. I missed a round of revisions and didn't respond directly, it seems the editor contacted me on the fifth day and asked me to email it directly to him so he could upload it to the system. I think it will take about a week for the editor to handle it.

(1) 讚！ | fjcyue007

It has been 13 days under review. Can you tell me if it is being reviewed by the editor or has it been sent for external review?

(0) 讚！ | 还得努力

May I ask what does "大u大r" mean in the first issue of this journal? Has it been submitted for review?

(0) 讚！ | LEO2480

On May 8th, around 12:30 noon today, I submitted the revised manuscript. In the afternoon, around 5 o'clock, they sent an email asking me to send the latex file again, but they did not mention that the paper was accepted. In the evening, around 8 o'clock, they sent me an email saying that the paper has been accepted. The sequence of events is really strange.

(0) 讚！ | fjcyue007

Please revise the fifth round on May 7th, abbreviate phrases, follow the reference format, and submit the paper to the journal.

(0) 讚！ | fjcyue007

The notice on May 4th asked for a fourth round of revisions. The reviewer said that he didn't need to review it again this time. I think he may have grown tired of it, so it's just a few minor formatting changes. The reviewer is too meticulous.

(0) 讚！ | fjcyue007

The submission was made again on March 13th and on March 18th, I received an email saying that the point-to-point response file was missing. I was asked to resend it separately to expedite the review process. I sent it back on the same day. I remember that I had uploaded it in the system, but I don't know why the system lost it. This submission and revision system requires the point-to-point response file to be uploaded twice. After a long review process, I received the third round of revision emails on April 13th. The first two rounds were major revisions, with one reviewer accepting the first round revisions immediately after review, while the same reviewer continued to ask for revisions in the second and third rounds. The third round was minor revisions, focusing on correcting some minor writing errors. I uploaded the revisions on April 16th, paying special attention to uploading the point-to-point response file. I am now waiting to see what the fourth round of review will bring. The editors and reviewers of this journal are particularly rigorous.

(0) 讚！ | fjcyue007

I was about three months old at that time.

(1) 讚！ | dixinyu

Hello, may I ask how long it takes for the first review results to come out for this journal? I submitted on January 18th and it is still under review.

(0) 讚！ | 晴天

Please translate the following passage into English: 111

(0) 讚！ | dixinyu

On February 7th, the revised draft was returned, and on February 28th, the second review came back. One person received it, and another person used AI to review the manuscript and torture me.

(0) 讚！ | fjcyue007

Submission on March 8, 2025
First revision on May 12, 2025
Returned after completion on June 10, 2025
Second revision on August 20, 2025
Returned after completion on September 2, 2025
Third revision for minor formatting edits on January 26, 2026
Returned after completion on February 9, 2026
Accepted for publication on February 10, 2026

(0) 讚！ | dezend

Submitted on December 15th, revised on January 21st, the deadline for revisions seems to be 3 months, what a generous timeframe.

(0) 讚！ | fjcyue007

Not very good, very sluggish.

(0) 讚！ | 逸仙888

This is so frustrating. I waited for nearly 3 months, and then there were 4 reviewers, with 2 rejecting the paper and 2 suggesting major revisions. In the end, the editor rejected it outright.

(1) 讚！ | 逸仙888

1.14 Submission
1.19 Under review

(0) 讚！ | 晴天

The submission was made on December 14th and was under review the same year. A notification for revision was sent on January 21st, granting a three-month period for revisions. The process was quite fast.

(0) 讚！ | fjcyue007

I want to ask about this journal. I submitted an EO 3 days ago and am still waiting for the editorial department to process it. I'm not sure about the speed of this journal. Thank you.

(0) 讚！ | 晴天

2025.11.13 Submission
2025.11.14 Editor requested modification of the corresponding author's email address
2025.11.15 Editor mentioned that the technical review has been completed, Under review (It is said that both editor review and external review are in this status) Hopefully it goes smoothly!

(0) 讚！ | 逸仙888

Excuse me, how long does the second trial take?

(0) 讚！ | dixinyu

The UR of this journal is not external review, it is internal review.

(0) 讚！ | Huang Dida