The paper has been accepted but is not yet online. Can I ask how long it takes for your xml2pdf to be done? My system has been showing the xml2pdf done page for 4 days now.

(0) 讚！ | 天天去钓鱼

The paper has been accepted for publication. How long ago did you finish xml2pdf? My system shows that the xml2pdf process has been completed for 4 days now.

(0) 讚！ | 天天去钓鱼

The submission was completed on March 16th, and the first round of external review was provided on March 31st, with major revisions requested (4 reviewers, the first reviewer accepted the paper directly, the second reviewer provided 3 major comments, the third reviewer provided 10 major comments, and the fourth reviewer provided 5 minor comments and grammar suggestions). After being given 15 days for revisions, I couldn't finish in time and applied for a one-week extension. The second round of external review was provided on April 26th, with major revisions requested again (the same four reviewers, the second reviewer said the revisions were good and accepted, the third reviewer said there were still 7 major comments that needed to be addressed, and the fourth reviewer said to add labels to all the figures and cite the sources). This time, 5 days were given for revisions, but I completed them in just 3 days. The third round of external review was provided on April 30th, with minor revisions requested (the same four reviewers, only the third reviewer mentioned to unify the font of the formulas and increase the resolution of the images), and 2 days were given for revisions. The revised manuscript was submitted on May 1st, the final proofreading was submitted on May 14th, the publication fee was paid on May 15th, and at 9 p.m. on May 22nd, I received an email informing me that the article had been published.

(0) 讚！ | 西区大魔王

Do we have to use the template of the journal?

(0) 讚！ | 且以

The good journal is the one that can be graduated from, and I will never have sleepless nights again. 
April 23 submit
April 24 ur
May 9 major 4 reviewers, 30+ revisions
May 13 resubmit
May 14 minor
May 15 resubmit
May 15 ped
May 17 accept

(0) 讚！ | 西瓜酱仔

This journal has not been warned at all now.

(0) 讚！ | Yuyang Wang

I have been studying for three years, my paper has been rejected for three years, I lost my scholarship, and my supervisor is fed up with me. Now that I finally have a friendly journal, you all say it's a low-quality journal. Whether the journal is good or not, do we not know? The journal only pays 20,000 yuan per article and the editorial department doesn't make any money. Who can guarantee they won't encounter a postgraduate student in their family? You warned us about it, now we all have to delay graduation. I don't want to delay graduation, I want to work. Is that okay?

(2) 讚！ | zxl88

4.7 Submission
4.13 Editing, confirming publication and checking fees
4.26 Waiting for results
Hope for AC

(0) 讚！ | HUMENGAMBER

3.7 Submission
3.9 Under review
3.24 Received comments from two reviewers, with seven days for revisions
3.25 Received another comment
3.31 Revision submitted
4.2 Minor revisions received
4.3 Accepted

(0) 讚！ | wowoow

Hello, may I ask which is your main phone number? Is it a Chinese phone number?

(0) 讚！ | gyd5010

Hello, may I ask which is your primary phone number? Is it a Chinese mobile phone number?

(0) 讚！ | gyd5010

Three districts have been established, and there is still potential, except for the high prices.

(4) 讚！ | guanwencan

What about the follow-up? Can you share more details?

(0) 讚！ | Yuyang Wang

December 16, 2025 - Submission
December 31, 2025 - Major revision
January 5, 2026 - Minor revision
January 7, 2026 - Acceptance

(0) 讚！ | 磊009

Submitted on December 8th, minor revisions on December 28th. One of the four reviewers had only one suggestion, while the others provided around 5 suggestions each, mainly suggesting to add an experiment and some figures. The reviewers' comments were very constructive. Submitted on January 7th, received the acceptance notification on the same evening. The process was very fast.

(0) 讚！ | shimaka2e

I made a phone call to urge in the morning of 12.25 and received the AC in the evening.

(0) 讚！ | Eugenia_Liu

The submission was made on November 22nd, and two weeks later, received major revisions from three reviewers; one of whom had a total of 10 suggestions for revisions, while the other two provided more positive comments. After submitting the revised manuscript, feedback was received from two of the reviewers one week later, with one suggesting improvements and the other accepting the submission. The third reviewer (who gave the most positive feedback) did not provide specific comments. Two days later, an acceptance notification was received.

(0) 讚！ | xiao_huang

11.20 pending review after submission
11.21 editor assignment
11.25 UR for conflict of interest statement
12.10 major revisions for a week, two reviewers provided fifteen comments
12.16 rvr
12.17 pending editor decision
hoping for AC

(0) 讚！ | Eugenia_Liu

Half a month later, the review results were returned, with 2 reviewers raising 9 questions and providing 5 days for minor revisions. After submitting the revised version in 5 days, the editor returned with the review comments from a third reviewer, who raised 11 questions. After making the necessary revisions and resubmitting, the paper was accepted.

(0) 讚！ | Calvin9458

After reading the reviewer's response, one of them asked me to upload a document, so I have uploaded it in the attachments.

(0) 讚！ | Ycy666

May I ask if submission requires submitting the original data?

(0) 讚！ | wwaatt

Received major repairs on 11.21.

(0) 讚！ | Ycy666

Reviewers for MDPI, Elsevier, Wiley, Springer, etc. are essentially no different. Reviewers from high impact factor journals will also review articles for MDPI, so it is natural to receive a variety of opinions. However, compared to some journals, MDPI has a fast review process and editors provide quick responses. Unlike some journals in the third or fourth quartile where submissions may go unanswered for six months...

(0) 讚！ | Dr.不会写SCI

2025-11-19 Paper submission Status: Pending review

(0) 讚！ | chen

It's good to submit, as long as it passes the review. I just submitted one a couple of days ago, with 5 reviewers, one of whom gave 34 comments. I'm amazed at how much revision is needed, it's even longer than the paper itself. I wonder what the reviewers are thinking.

(0) 讚！ | VVVVVenus