The efficiency of the journal's editors is very high. Submissions made on Sunday morning are sent for review the next day. On the same day, 6 people are invited to review, with 4 people accepting the invitation. The reviews are completed quickly, and it is felt that the editors of this journal are very efficient. The reviewers are enthusiastic and the efficiency is also very fast.

(0) 讚！ | SS

4.24 rrc

(0) 讚！ | SSAC

Bro, did you only receive the edits from the deputy editor and accept them? How long approximately before I can go back for revisions? I just returned today.

(0) 讚！ | 打灰机

You have been hired, please wait a moment.

(0) 讚！ | Ben_accept

I have been busy with the pre-defense and submission recently, and the time for revision has been extended by a month. I just returned for revision today and am waiting for the results.

(0) 讚！ | 打灰机

Can I ask what the situation is after just editing minor fixes, have you received it?

(0) 讚！ | zwzw11

Normally three reviewers.

(0) 讚！ | zane99

2025.4.12 rrc

(0) 讚！ | SSAC

Please translate the following paragraph into English: UR 0/0/5 4.16

Translation: UR 0/0/5 4.16

(0) 讚！ | karna

Hello, I wanted to ask if there are any results yet. I am in a similar situation, where the editor requested improvements in grammar and a resubmission, and it has been two weeks.

(0) 讚！ | hyz02

Isn't the official website supposed to have formatting requirements?

(0) 讚！ | karna

Hello, does this journal have a Word template available?

(0) 讚！ | Cchy1

3.29 The editor rejected the submission, stating that the contribution was not prominent enough. The revised file has been resubmitted and is currently with the editor for further review.

(0) 讚！ | karna

Bro, my situation is similar to yours. Can I ask how your paper is going now and how did you solve it?

(0) 讚！ | haha12434

Record:
2025.1.16 submit
2025.1.20 ur
2025.2.07 2-4-6 rrc
2025.2.11 rc editor gave major revisions
2025.2.18 submit revised manuscript
2025.2.20 0-1-6 editor sent for review
2025.2.24 1-1-6 one reviewer replied, the other one seems to have disappeared
2025.3.05 1-5-10 editor added more reviewers
2025.3.11 4-5-10 rrc came back with 4 comments, feeling anxious
2025.3.13 rc editor gave minor revisions
2025.3.18 submit review comments
2025.3.19 0-3-4 ur
2025.3.20 2-3-4 rrc
2025.3.24 3-3-4 rrc
2025.3.29 3-3-4 rrc suddenly slowed down, rrc for 9 consecutive days

(0) 讚！ | hh差一点

2025.1.2 The third reminder, this time with a more forceful attitude, mentioning concerns about the article becoming outdated due to the long time taken. The editor replied sincerely, adding a 1-2-13.
2025.2.2 The recipient of the added material neither rejected nor responded to the feedback, reverting back to 1-1-13.
2025.3.22 The fourth reminder was sent directly to the Elsevier official website, receiving a lengthy apology from the editor, stating that a single review opinion is not conclusive.
2025.3.29 The status remains at 1-1-13, feeling like the editor is avoiding responsibility. It has been almost a year and it is unclear whether the article will be withdrawn or if further reminders are necessary.

(0) 讚！ | hh差一点

Record the submission time, nearly a year, a very rough submission, feeling that the editor has tried his best, the direction is related to BIM, urged four times. I don't know what to do in this situation, should I provide the recommended list of reviewers again next time I urge them? It's strange that no one accepted the review.

2024.4.18 submit
2024.5.17 Reviewer comments: one major revision, one seems to be a malicious rejection (reply to comments on the same day, less than an hour apart), finally rejected by the editor
2024.5.22 Resubmitted, thought there was nothing wrong with the writing, made major revisions according to the first reviewer's comments, declared in the cover letter that I may have been maliciously rejected
2024.6.11 Editor reviewed and sent for review, under review
2024.7.12 0-0-4, strange that no one gave comments
2024.7.30 0-1-10, editor added another reviewer, someone agreed to review
2024.8.19 1-1-10, first reviewer replied with comments
2024.8.30 Urged the editor, editor added another reviewer 1-2-11
2024.9.30 The additional reviewer did not provide comments, became 1-1-11
2024.10.31 Urged again. Editor added another reviewer 1-2-12
2024.12.2 The additional reviewer did not provide comments, became 1-1-12

(0) 讚！ | hh差一点

The reviewers are very interested in the rationale and objectives, but unfortunately there are some issues with the writing (too rushed). They recommend redoing all experiments and submitting a revised manuscript today.

(0) 讚！ | karna

It has been another two weeks, the situation is still the same, are there any similar brothers?

(0) 讚！ | Ben_accept

2-15 Minor revisions for second review submitted
2-20 under review, one reviewer submitted comments on the same day
3-3 under review, second reviewer submitted comments
3-12 RRC changed to DIP
3-13 Minor revisions requested from associate editor only
Looking forward to early acceptance

(0) 讚！ | 打灰机

Do you not know yet?

(0) 讚！ | PaperMachine+

Any news?

(0) 讚！ | 打灰机

Please translate the following paragraph into English: 1.25投出
今天3.12，现在数据
1-2-5，这种得等到什么时候？

投出1.25
Today is 3.12, the data is now
1-2-5, when will this be available?

(0) 讚！ | Hengzhun

The English customer service is of no use. It looks like I will have to wait again. Please let me know if there is any news. Thank you, brother.

(0) 讚！ | PaperMachine+

It seems I'll have to wait a little longer. Please let me know if there's any news. Thank you, brother.

(0) 讚！ | PaperMachine+