The submission made in November was accepted in April, but the revisions were sent back very slowly, taking one month to be returned.

(0) 讚！ | QinYY

There is no peer review stage, my submission has been pending for over three months with no updates.

(0) 讚！ | 不错

Yes, it's very chaotic. I don't even know how to contact the editors for deadline reminders.

(0) 讚！ | ggyyg

How long does it take to assign the editing task to submission?

(0) 讚！ | xdsfefcrcda

Very bad, the entire editing team has issues, their skills are very poor, and they can't even be reached by email. Not recommended to waste time here.

(0) 讚！ | 51cd

Submitted on December 10th, 2024, accepted on March 13th, 2015, the process went very smoothly overall. The reviewers were also very meticulous, providing valuable feedback for the repeated revisions of the paper.

(1) 讚！ | Shdhdh

Is there any change now? What step are we at?

(0) 讚！ | Dany1

BMC Plant Biology
2024.12.17 Submission received
2024.12.18 Amendment requested
2024.12.21 Editor assigned
2024.12.25 Under Review
2024.12.27 Reviewer(s) accepted
2025.1.2 Revision requested
2025.1.11 Revision received
2025.1.18 Under Review
2025.1.18 Reviewer(s) accepted
2025.1.21 Revision requested
2025.2.3 Revision received
2025.2.4 Revision requested
2025.2.17 Revision received
2025.2.18 Revision requested
2025.2.23 Revision received
2025.2.24 Accepted

(0) 讚！ | 梦里花香

I am in the same situation as you. I submitted a reference for revision, and it has been over a month with no response. I am getting really anxious!

(0) 讚！ | xiaodandan

May I ask which email address should I send the reminder email to? It has been six months without any updates.

(0) 讚！ | 土壤人~

Hello, I would like to ask which email address should I use to contact? My first review has been sitting in the editing department for 6 months. I have tried to urge the submission using the official website's email, but there has been no response. I feel desperate.

(0) 讚！ | 土壤人~

Fight to the end! Don't let the garbage editing and the articles of this magazine fall into my hands.

(0) 讚！ | ssagw

So slow, it's been 22 months, I'm going to stick with you until the end, I want to see when this will finally be over!!!

(0) 讚！ | ssagw

12.1 Submit
12.5 With editor
12.6 Peer review
12.20 Reviewer report(s) received- first
12.28 Reviewer report(s) received- second
2025.1.2 Revision requested
1.7 Submit revisions
1.10 Peer review
1.12 Reviewer report(s) received- first
1.14 Reviewer report(s) received- second
1.15 Accepted
Total of 45 days.

(0) 讚！ | WFRGWETG

What state are you in now?

(0) 讚！ | 学术废材2.03

It's been more than forty days, no movement, reminded twice but still no response.

(0) 讚！ | Li

It is indeed very slow. I submitted in July 23rd, 2023, revised in May 24th, 2024, and still have not heard back.

(0) 讚！ | QCQQ

The review process is too slow. I submitted in April 2024 and still haven't heard anything. Frustrating...

(1) 讚！ | ZGF

Please be cautious when submitting your manuscript, as there has been no response since submitting the revised version on August 1st. Despite following up twice with the editor, there has been no progress as of December 31st.

(0) 讚！ | 阿莫西林

The major revision will be back in 15 days, the second minor revision will change a word, it has been almost a month, there is no news yet, could it be that they are on vacation abroad, who will understand when the thesis is finished, family members.

(0) 讚！ | Li

I would like to ask everyone, my technical review did not pass, and I was asked to provide clinical trial registration information. However, my research is in the field of botany and has nothing to do with clinical trials. After replying, I was sent back again by the technical review. What should I do? Please guide me.

(0) 讚！ | Shdhdh

Editor Sharda Gaikwad is likely a technical editor responsible for providing technical support throughout the entire publication process, including manuscript formatting. Yuhui Liu, another editor, is responsible for the final review of manuscripts and providing acceptance recommendations, similar to an academic editor.

(0) 讚！ | Rockyflying

When I submitted my article for the first time, it passed the technical check and was then assigned to an academic editor. However, Sharda Gaikwad asked me to revise the format. What's going on?

(0) 讚！ | WFRGWETG

Is Sharda Gaikwad an academic editor?

(0) 讚！ | WFRGWETG

Sorry, it was a mistake. It's not a rejection from the second review, but a refusal to review the manuscript in the second review (not sure what this situation is about). In such cases, editors usually have to find a new reviewer, which really delays the process. Hopefully, you won't encounter this.

(0) 讚！ | Rockyflying