After two and a half months of submission, it was rejected because they couldn't find a reviewer.

(0) 讚！ | ssssss123

It's not fast. Either we can't find the reviewer for rework, or they accept it without reviewing it, even minor revisions are sent for external review. It's driving me crazy.

(0) 讚！ | yes11996

Similarly, it has been a month since the new editor took over. In the past, this magazine was known for its fast pace, but this time, the feedback and reviews seem to be different from before.

(0) 讚！ | zhengyi8304

It has been almost a month since the second review was sent back. One reviewer has been ignoring it and not reviewing it. Anxious...

(0) 讚！ | 佐心迩

It's been almost a month since the second review was sent back. There is a reviewer who has been ignoring the review. It's so urgent.

(0) 讚！ | yes11996

I also want to ask how often it will be updated, as I have been editing it continuously.

(0) 讚！ | 施景龙 SHI

How long did it take to make the first decision?

(0) 讚！ | 施景龙 SHI

Is it a commissioned review?

(0) 讚！ | 施景龙 SHI

Is it normal for the review process to take so long? It has been 5 days and I am still "with editor".

(0) 讚！ | liunian xie

Hello, my days have been with the editor recently, it seems like it's a technical review.

(0) 讚！ | 刘娇娇

How long until it is submitted for review later?

(0) 讚！ | 刘娇娇

How long will it take to submit for review later?

(0) 讚！ | 刘娇娇

4.11 Submission
6.21 Review comments received, a total of two reviewers, with 17 comments.
6.30 Revision
7.3 Acceptance.

(0) 讚！ | smart宋

Do you still accept bibliometrics?

(0) 讚！ | 是宝宝吖

Could you please tell me how to view the specific process? On which day did the reviewer accept the invitation? On which day did they complete the review?

(0) 讚！ | grinning

Half an hour ago, I was hired. Let me update the timeline:
4.15 Third reviewer accepted the review.
4.27 Comments from the third reviewer returned, and both reviewers completed the review, automatically leading to RRC.
4.28 Editor requested major revisions.
5.3 Revised manuscript submitted for second review.
5.4 Submitted for review.
5.13 RRC.
5.15 Editor requested major revisions.
5.20 Revised manuscript submitted for third review, sent for review the same day.
5.29 RRC.
5.30 Accept.

The first reviewer was obviously an AI reviewer, and their comments were quite silly. However, they were kind and had a bias in their opinions.
The second reviewer was very sharp, hitting the main points directly, and even mentioned concerns about the scientific rigor of the article. I am not sure if it will require major revisions, I even thought they might recommend rejection in the first review. But it seems like in this journal, major revisions + rejection = rejection, so it is likely to be major revisions.

For the second review, I was quite casual in addressing the comments from the first reviewer, but they still said I addressed all their concerns...haha, what a lenient reviewer.
In the second review, the second reviewer still found some errors in my manuscript. This person indeed paid attention to detail.

After 8 days of revisions for the third review, the second reviewer also accepted it. I thought this person might have some negative comments again, and it almost scared me to death.

(0) 讚！ | 晚风吻尽荷花叶

I am also in this state, what state are you in now?

(0) 讚！ | Wang jingtao

Oh my goodness, I don't need external validation.

(0) 讚！ | 冰凌忍冬

It shouldn't be, right?

(0) 讚！ | 冰凌忍冬

How is everything going?

(0) 讚！ | 冰凌忍冬

I also want to ask how long it will take for changes to be made after "with editor", and when can I be notified.

(0) 讚！ | 冰凌忍冬

3.13 submitted for review
3.13 invited 6 reviewers
The first reviewer accepted the invitation on 3.13
The first reviewer completed the review on 3.15 (accepted the invitation on the same day, completed the review in 2 days, this reviewer is super fast)
The second reviewer accepted the invitation on 3.15
4.10 added 4 more invitations (a total of 10 reviewers invited) because the editor thought the second reviewer had disappeared
The third reviewer accepted the invitation on 4.15

(0) 讚！ | 晚风吻尽荷花叶

After submitting my paper, I was rejected with comments, feeling frustrated. The main issue was with the writing of the paper. I wanted to ask if I need to change the title of the paper before resubmitting it? Is the problem of duplicate paper titles preventing submission?

(0) 讚！ | 北方大虾

After I went back for rework, my speed was not as fast as the first review. Have you got any results?

(0) 讚！ | 我懒

Please translate the following paragraph into English: "Shabi Chinese Academy of Sciences."

(0) 讚！ | 小卖铺老板