The three rounds of revisions, editing, review by experts, and the associate editor all received high praise. However, the editor-in-chief rejected the submission in less than half a day, citing grammar issues in the title. It is advised not to submit the article elsewhere.

(1) 讚！ | 铁索横江

Very slow, it has been 15 days.

(1) 讚！ | kk5678

May I ask what the current status is now?

(0) 讚！ | jjkjjk

Has anyone submitted to this journal recently? It has been 10 days with the editor.

(0) 讚！ | maifan dong

Submission on November 9, 2024, review in two weeks. Revision on January 14, 2025. Revised manuscript returned on February 6, 2025. Accepted on March 19, 2025. The speed is moderate.

(0) 讚！ | chanhuizhe

The processing speed is too slow, invest cautiously!

(1) 讚！ | YUBOY

May I ask if it has been submitted for review?

(1) 讚！ | z1.

OP, have you been hired now?

(0) 讚！ | 爱德华兹

Too slow. Cancel and try another one

(0) 讚！ | nv4dll

Submitted on February 26th, still pending with journal on March 6th

(0) 讚！ | nv4dll

One rejection, one minor revision, one major revision from the editor - does the acceptance rate increase?

(0) 讚！ | 十一月

Have I been hired now?

(2) 讚！ | z1.

Almost a month has passed and the journal still hasn't been submitted

(0) 讚！ | 十一月

Is anyone still working at the journal? It's been many days since I submitted my manuscript, and it just shows as "submitted to the journal". If it has closed down, they should have informed us earlier

(0) 讚！ | Doctor. zhu

With editor lasted for a month and nothing happened. Later, the journal changed the editor. The efficiency was much higher, thanks. It was accepted smoothly 2 months later. There are many factors that affect the review speed—some of which are fast, some of which some are slow, and it is not easy to generalize about that. I like this journal very much and hope it gets better and better.

(0) 讚！ | 自由星

The article is not focused, and long articles are preferred. The articles would probably be accepted as long as the data and materials were piled. The conclusion is the same as the classical literature, except it is made for CO2. The quality of articles has decreased seriously compared to those in 2015 and 2016.

(32) 讚！ | cc2016

1 hour and a half after being editedInform the content of the manuscript and the direction of the journal does not match.

(0) 讚！ | 呵呵哒

1 Submitted on the 20th, and acceptd on April 4.On March 4th, I replied to the preliminary review. After two weeks of revision, I will accept it directly.I feel that the speed of review is not as slow as others have said.The reviewers are two.The article does the simulation plus experiment, not a large industrial equipment or a combination of factories.It feels quite good.The impact factor is also very large

(0) 讚！ | 251837877@qq.com

Strictly, he has selectd three articles and was rejected.The review is slower.

(0) 讚！ | xiang

Submission in August 2014, UNDERVIEW on October 3, and the results of the review have not been submitted for the past 5 months, slow.

(0) 讚！ | dengdai

This journal is now a journal of several districts

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

finally accepted again, so let’s talk about the experience of submissionLet's go.This journal is really suitable for us to absorb carbon dioxide, so I selectd.After 3 months, the editor wrote a letter saying that it was received, but it was to be revised.Then modified and re-submited, after 2 months, the editor had a letter to accept, but to modify to meet the editor's requirements; then carefully revised, and then selectd, a few days later, the editor said accept.I feel that the journal is very serious now, 4 to 5 reviewers.Is this year's impact factor falling too much, so the requirements are strict.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

In this journal, one of the editors of the CO2 capture research is now changed to Juan Carlos Abanades. This journal focuses on the engineering scale of CCS. It is difficult to rely on small fluidized beds, fixed bed or TGA articles.Accepted.Good luck to everyone!

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

3 At the beginning of the month, the notice of overhaul was received at the end of August, and the revised draft was received in mid-October in mid-November.Excluding the revised time, the review took about 6 months.Because IF is very high, and so on.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

is consistent with the legend, this journal is a word, too slow!I selectd for a month and still with the editor, emailing the editor, and Ignore it.Update the following, now almost two months, the status has not changed.

(1) 讚！ | 匿名