Awesome!!!

(0) 讚！ | 我是一枚垃圾

A well-established authoritative journal in the field of physiology, where many Nobel Prize winners have published articles. Submitted on August 28, 2025; Final revisions submitted on November 29, 2025; Accepted on January 5, 2026.

(0) 讚！ | 从来都不会放弃

The direction I took was a bit off, and many people didn't understand it. Regarding the neurobiological mechanisms of brain-machine interfaces and mind control, I submitted to many journals. The basic situation was that most reviewers couldn't understand it. Later, I found out that this journal had published relevant articles before, so I submitted it. After 30 days, I received the result and the editor asked me to supplement the experiment and resubmit it. The experiment was not very difficult, just some staining of slices and so on. I supplemented it and sent it back in 30 days. It was returned for minor revisions, which took 10 days to complete. They asked me to change the format, and after I made the changes and submitted it, it was accepted in two days. It took a total of 126 days, which is considered fast. This journal is well-established, and the editors are very professional. The key is that they can understand it. It's not easy for them to understand my article. Overall, I feel that this journal is fast and professional, and the editors have a high level of autonomy. It's worth submitting to, but of course it needs to be aligned with the journal's focus, otherwise it's not easy to submit.

(0) 讚！ | kittyone

Both submissions in 2020 and 2022 were excellent. The first review result was received in about one and a half months for both submissions, and both were conditionally accepted. The reviewers' suggestions were pertinent, and they had a positive evaluation of the articles. The editor mentioned that making slight modifications according to the reviewers' suggestions would enable the submissions to be accepted.

(0) 讚！ | 老骥伏枥1987

Just accept the editor's revision suggestions directly. If you disagree, just write down your reasons below the comments and then send them back to the editor. If both parties do not agree, then negotiate

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

When responding to the comments of the reviewers, all questions must be answered one by one without omission; try to meet the experimental requirements mentioned in the comments, and if unable to meet them, provide reasonable reasons why it cannot be done; the literature recommended by the reviewers must be cited and thoroughly discussed; when submitting the revised manuscript, make sure to verify the corrections made in the original manuscript.

If you agree with the modifications proposed by the journal editor, you can directly accept the modifications. If you disagree, write down your reasons directly below the comments, and then provide feedback to the editor. If there is disagreement between the two sides, further negotiation should be conducted

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

How to respond to comments from journal editors?

(0) 讚！ | 魂魄彦露

What is the difference between responding to reviewers' comments and responding to the journal editor's comments?

(0) 讚！ | Darlene Pepys

Four weeks after the first review, two reviewers raised a lot of questions. Although they did not request additional experiments, the editor asked for them. The manuscript was rejected for resubmission. After three months of revising and conducting additional experiments, the manuscript was resubmitted. Three weeks later, after the second review, minor revisions and formatting changes were made. The revised manuscript was resubmitted within three days and after seven days the third review was completed. The manuscript was accepted for publication

(0) 讚！ | 四风玉泽

The first review returned after 4 weeks. Two reviewers raised a lot of questions but did not ask for a supplementary experiment. However, the editor rejected the manuscript and requested a supplementary experiment and resubmit. We supplemented the experiment and revised it for 3 months, and then resubmitted it. The second review returned after 3 weeks, requiring minor revisions and format changes. It was revised and resubmitted in 3 days, and the third review ended in 7 days, with an acceptance!

(1) 讚！ | Real2005

Review Speed: 1.0 Experience Sharing: Submitted for review and received feedback after one month. Two reviewers raised some profound professional questions, requesting further discussion on the mechanisms without additional experimental data. However, the editor's decision was to reject the submission and requested additional experiments. Currently making revisions diligently, hoping for acceptance as it is a well-established journal with over a hundred years of history and good reputation!

(0) 讚！ | 断门淑宁

The review comments returned in a month after submission. There were two reviewers, who raised many profound and professional questions, and requested to supplement discussion on the mechanism. They didn’t request to supplement experiments. However, the editor concluded that the manuscript was rejected and resubmission was advised, and supplementing experiments was requested. I am revising the manuscript with efforts, and I hope it can be accepted. After all, it is a time-honored journal with a history of more than 100 years, and its reputation is very good!

(1) 讚！ | Jack2005

Review speed: 1.0 Experience sharing: Submitted on January 4, 2019, received a rejection letter from the editor on January 7, with some very polite words, and ended with “We hope that our expedited editorial decision will allow you to submit your work to another journal with minimal delay.” The experience was good, and it did not waste time

(0) 讚！ | 泄矢驰颖

Stuck in the middle, but reaching this stage of the journal was not easy already. A score of over 4 is quite satisfactory

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

The submission was rejected within 10 days, quite fast. The reviewers' comments were fair, with high requirements for data quality and also required an ethics approval number to be provided

(0) 讚！ | 桃花秋梓

My manuscript was rejected at 10 days after submission. The process is very fast! The review comments are relatively pertinent, and the data quality requirements are very high. It is also necessary to fill in the ethical review number.

(2) 讚！ | hh

Submission 55 days to receive a rejection letter, the reply is too slow and too slow!It is strongly recommended that you do not select.The boss has to select for this, and I have no choice.

(7) 讚！ | Anonymous

Received rejection letter after 55 days of submission, too slow to respond! Strongly suggest not to submit. Boss insists on submitting this, I have no choice

(0) 讚！ | Isaac McCarthy

Received rejection letter after 55 days of submission, too slow! Strongly recommend everyone not to submit!

(0) 讚！ | 明冠优瑗

The boss insisted on investing in this, which made me frustrated

(0) 讚！ | 明冠优瑗

What is the direction of this magazine?

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁