After making minor revisions (approximately 20 suggestions), the article was accepted for publication.

(0) 讚！ | hsuan14

It's been over a month and I still haven't received WE, what's going on with this publication.

(0) 讚！ | Augenst3rn

Why is it taking so long? It has been over a month since I assigned the editor.

(0) 讚！ | Augenst3rn

I completed the verification on June 16th, but still cannot retrieve it now. What is the situation?

(0) 讚！ | yzk

How do we know if it's a major revision? The official website doesn't specify whether it's a major or minor revision. I invited two reviewers for this article and received a total of 20 comments. One of them suggested minor revisions, but provided 15 comments.

(0) 讚！ | hsuan14

Caution!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Submitted to the editor for review, it took two and a half months, and then the reviewers were not even contacted, the manuscript was directly rejected, and the reasons for rejection were completely unconvincing. Caution! Caution! Caution!

(0) 讚！ | Ekko

Invited more than ten reviewers, 7 accepted, and 4 have returned their opinions. Why hasn't the editor made a decision yet? Do we need to wait for all 7 opinions to come back?

(0) 讚！ | 芜湖起飞11111

A little pressure doesn't work at all, they're just trying to deceive me. It's been a month and we still haven't. I give up.

(0) 讚！ | ukiyo

The entire process took one year and one month. I will never forget this journal in my lifetime. My brother, I wish you good luck, but also be mentally prepared for the worst. It's best to quickly write and submit a few more articles to other journals, strive to meet the graduation requirements first, and then prepare to find a job as soon as possible.

(0) 讚！ | jjacktom

Brother, I guess you must have suffered like me. This journal has been torturing me. The first round of revisions passed the technical review in two days, then it sat in the editor's office for a month. By the time it came back, the reviewers probably forgot their comments. They were too lazy to review it again and ran away. Then new reviewers were invited, and all three agreed to review it. I made the changes and sent it back. The third round of revisions came back just three days after my thesis defense. At that time, I didn't even think about getting this article accepted. I had already met the graduation requirements and was ready to graduate. If it wasn't for Professor Bi pushing me to continue editing, I would have given up long ago. I finished the revisions in one day, even though they were rushed. I didn't care if it got accepted. It was accepted a week later, and a few days after that, I left the school. Just sharing my experience with this journal, it was quite a journey.

(0) 讚！ | jjacktom

The only word that can describe this journal is "historical". I should be the slowest one, it took me a year and a month to accept it just a few days before graduation. Luckily I wrote three articles, the third one was not submitted to my junior in time. The second one was selected for Zone 2, this fourth zone historical journal was the first one I completed. I almost delayed my graduation by trying this journal for the first time. Fortunately, the article in Zone 2 was selected in just two and a half months, I graduated and found a job, and now I wish everyone can be successful in their submissions and not encounter this kind of historical journal.

(0) 讚！ | jjacktom

This journal is super slow. It took me six and a half months to receive the first round of revisions for my first article, and after I made the revisions, it has been sitting in the editor's hands for a full three weeks with no response. Avoid this damn journal, it's really slow. My second article was rejected, with the reason being that they have too many articles to handle. It's just too slow, too slow. They accepted my second rejected article, I am truly amazed.

(2) 讚！ | cllsys

I submitted the third revision on June 2nd, and it is still under review by the editorial board. This journal is slower than the first-tier journals.

(0) 讚！ | lycutter

At the beginning of June, EA is still EA. I give up. Will it ever get better?

(0) 讚！ | ukiyo

It takes about 40 days for the submission to go through peer review, and the editor invites more than 10 reviewers. Is this normal?

(0) 讚！ | zzz11gd

Unable to retrieve, not sure what the problem is.

(0) 讚！ | Ma_duidui

Be cautious when submitting articles while waiting for graduation. The first article took six and a half months for the first round of revisions, which required adding some strange experiments. The second article was rejected due to too many submissions, causing delays. Progress is like opening a blind box, as some people were accepted after three or four months. It may be that the journal's fast processing speed and easy submission process attracted too many submissions, making it difficult to submit now. It may be worth looking for other journals to submit to.

(1) 讚！ | cllsys

May I ask if you are able to retrieve it now? I noticed that there have been no new articles posted on the official website of this journal in the past 11 days, which is unusual compared to previous months.

(0) 讚！ | gggggg123

At least wait for a month.

(0) 讚！ | TTT**

It's been almost a month, and there is no news at all.

(0) 讚！ | zzz11gd

In less than a month.

(0) 讚！ | Ma_duidui

- Submitted the initial draft in December of 24.
- Returned for major revisions in March of 25, with over 30 comments from two reviewers, mostly requesting additional experiments.
- Another round of major revisions in June of 25, this time with three new reviewers requesting more experiments. Some even requested experiments unrelated to the experimental methods (such as the impact of optimizer selection and learning rate on performance).
- The editor's processing speed is getting slower each time, the first round was handled in a week, the second round took 10 days, and now the third round has been sitting for two weeks with no progress. It is truly torturous, if I have to revise again, I will just submit to another journal.

(0) 讚！ | lycutter

How long has it been for everyone? It's been a month, why haven't we received any news yet? Did it get lost in the mail?

(0) 讚！ | 芜湖起飞11111

Submitted on 27th February 2025
Technical review passed on 28th February
Editor assigned on 28th February
Editing on 22nd March
Two reviewers invited on 22nd March
Reviewers accepted on 23rd March
Reviewers provided feedback on 24th March
Major revisions on 17th April
Submitted on 15th May
Reviewers invited on 25th May
Reviewers accepted on 25th May
Reviewers provided feedback on 25th May
Accepted on 3rd June

(1) 讚！ | Ma_duidui

Peer review
First reviewer(s) invited on June 4, 2025
Reviewer(s) accepted on June 4, 2025.

(0) 讚！ | pyh