The second-instance RRC has been one month.

(0) 讚！ | Yan_SCU

It's been half a month since the second-instance DIP. How long does it usually take for everyone to reach this stage?

(0) 讚！ | 你醒醒-

4.6 修订稿已提交至期刊。

(0) 讚！ | LCguangzhou

Sorry, I forgot to reply later.
2025.9.22 Returned
2025.10.4 UR
2025.10.15 6-6-4 rrc
2025.10.16 6-6-4 received

(1) 讚！ | 小可爱必中

2025.5.10 resubmit
2025.6.7 accept
The editor, Zhang, is very efficient and provides professional comments. The revisions mainly focus on technical issues. Although the resubmission deadline is only 20 days, the improvements are significant despite the challenging process. Hope the journal continues to improve!

(0) 讚！ | hh差一点

@wwwwwwww. Have you received any messages, bro?

(0) 讚！ | 十二点前去睡觉

Yes, in the EM of communication, there are only two options: "View Submission" and "Send E-mail", you cannot see specific comments, and there is nothing in the mailbox of communication.

(0) 讚！ | 奇奇怪怪的人

Please note that only the editor has the right to upload and modify drafts. Other authors can only view the status and cannot edit the system.

(0) 讚！ | 年轮

Yes, theoretically it should be like that, but in the email there is only "view submission" and "send letter", strange.

(0) 讚！ | 奇奇怪怪的人

Sent back to author generally means there is a problem with the format (such as reference formatting). Click on "view letter" on the left for instructions, and make the necessary changes before resubmitting. Have you resubmitted it?

(1) 讚！ | JurassicK

Please translate the following passage into English: 3.25 major

(1) 讚！ | LCguangzhou

I submitted it on March 8th, it showed "sent back to author" on the 10th, and it has been half a month now with no change in status. I haven't received any messages, it's really strange.

(0) 讚！ | 爆炸科学系

After the first review, I was directly dismissed, am I done for?

(0) 讚！ | wwwwwwwww.

You are reviewing so fast!

(0) 讚！ | 默碱

It has been 3 months since I submitted the manuscript, can I send a reminder now on 8-2-1?

(0) 讚！ | 默碱

3.23 DIP 6/5/3

(1) 讚！ | LCguangzhou

3.19 RRC 6/5/2

(1) 讚！ | LCguangzhou

3.6 UR 6/5/1

(1) 讚！ | LCguangzhou

2.28 UR 6/5/0 feels like it's going to be criticized to pieces.

(0) 讚！ | LCguangzhou

The review process was quite slow, waited for more than a month, but the review came back in just 2 weeks, and then only gave 2 weeks to make revisions (too rushed). Overall, the fast review process is a major advantage, with better reputation than CBM. The next article will be submitted to JRMGE (high impact factor), hoping that the impact factor will also increase a bit, instead of constantly dropping.

(1) 讚！ | 热爱科研的一个小太阳

After replying to the email, it was sent for review. 
1.6 WE
2.23 UR Currently 6/4/0

(2) 讚！ | LCguangzhou

Brother, add me as a friend. We have the same direction, let's help each other out.

(0) 讚！ | 皮皮蛋蛋

2026.02.09 Just to add, reject, saying that the manuscript does not meet the journal requirements.

(0) 讚！ | why314@

I contacted the official customer service three times, reminding them once a week. The manuscript was submitted for review the day before yesterday, but only two reviewers were invited. It seems difficult, and it will be another long wait.

(1) 讚！ | 1889221

I have reminded the customer service once, but it has not been submitted for review yet.

(0) 讚！ | wql1997