8.18 Submission passed technical check.

(0) 讚！ | 太子爷

26.7.14 Submission passed technical check
26.7.14 First reviewer(s) invited
26.7.16 Reviewer(s) accepted
26.7.21 Reviewer report(s) received
26.8.10 Revision requested
26.8.12 Revision received
26.8.13 Submission passed technical check
26.8.13 First reviewer(s) invited
26.8.14 Reviewer(s) accepted
26.8.14 Reviewer report(s) received
26.8.16 Submission accepted

(0) 讚！ | CCED

26.2.24 Submission passed technical check
26.2.24 Ready for editorial assignment
26.2.24 Editor assigned
26.2.26 First reviewer(s) invited
26.2.28 Reviewer(s) accepted
26.3.08 Reviewer report(s) received
26.3.28 Revision requested
26.7.10 Revision received
26.7.13 Amendment requested
26.7.13 Amendment received

(0) 讚！ | CCED

Just received an article, after a half year of struggling, I want to share the process.
Submitted on New Year's Day, went through many rounds of tech checks before reaching the editor.
First round of revisions, three reviewers, each with less than twenty questions. Responded with a 40-page, over 10,000-word letter.
Second round of revisions, two had no comments, one had two suggestions.
The reviewers' comments were all very professional, and the efficiency of the journal is average. Hope to see improvements in the future~

(0) 讚！ | CCED

Three reviewers, dozens of opinions. Responded with over ten thousand words and added several more experiments. Returned today.

(0) 讚！ | 太子爷

The review article is still looking for reviewers.

(0) 讚！ | 孟孟必中

You are a little too fast.

(0) 讚！ | bin he

Are there many suggestions given?

(0) 讚！ | 咸鱼

Received major revision email on July 5th, with three reviewers. Currently working on conducting additional experiments.

(0) 讚！ | 太子爷

The editor has received 3 reviewer reports for 11 days.

(0) 讚！ | 太子爷

The editor has received 3 reviewer reports for 3 days.

(0) 讚！ | 太子爷

The editor has received 3 reviewer reports. It has been 3 days and the editor has not made a decision yet.

(0) 讚！ | 太子爷

The review process is fast, the reviewers are professional and very strict. They raised 50 questions and provided a response of 10,000 words. In the end, the paper was accepted.

(0) 讚！ | mk爱科研

First instance 6 months.

(0) 讚！ | bin he

Four reviewers accepted the review invitation all at once, oh my goodness.

(0) 讚！ | 太子爷

The current display reads: "Reviewer(s) accepted 10 Jun 2026." Does this mean one reviewer has been invited? Or have enough reviewers been invited?

(0) 讚！ | 太子爷

Thank you @【88Hua88】.

(0) 讚！ | 太子爷

It is now 6.03, still showing "First reviewer(s) invited 20 May 2026". Does this mean that no reviewers have agreed to review yet?

(0) 讚！ | 太子爷

Yes, if the review is accepted, it will be updated, and my second day will show that one reviewer has accepted the review.

(0) 讚！ | 88Hua88

It is now 5.29 and it still shows "First reviewer(s) invited 20 May 2026". Does this mean that no reviewers have agreed to review yet?

(0) 讚！ | 太子爷

After peer review, it has been 5 days since the editor invited more than 10 reviewers. Does this mean that no reviewers have accepted the review invitation? Will it be shown if a reviewer accepts the review invitation?

(1) 讚！ | 太子爷

After submitting the manuscript, a technical review is required, and WB full membrane is needed.

(0) 讚！ | 西红柿炒番茄

May I ask how to send an email to the editor? I only found Madelyn.Marciano@springernature.com, but it seems like an editor from Springer Nature, not the editor handling the manuscript.

(0) 讚！ | FengJJ111

Do you want the WB original strip?

(0) 讚！ | jizhen cen

The first trial took 6 months, but the repair process was quick. We need the WB tape.

(1) 讚！ | bin he