The editor has received 3 reviewer reports for 11 days.

(0) 讚！ | 太子爷

The editor has received 3 reviewer reports for 3 days.

(0) 讚！ | 太子爷

The editor has received 3 reviewer reports. It has been 3 days and the editor has not made a decision yet.

(0) 讚！ | 太子爷

The review process is fast, the reviewers are professional and very strict. They raised 50 questions and provided a response of 10,000 words. In the end, the paper was accepted.

(0) 讚！ | mk爱科研

First instance 6 months.

(0) 讚！ | bin he

Four reviewers accepted the review invitation all at once, oh my goodness.

(0) 讚！ | 太子爷

The current display reads: "Reviewer(s) accepted 10 Jun 2026." Does this mean one reviewer has been invited? Or have enough reviewers been invited?

(0) 讚！ | 太子爷

Thank you @【88Hua88】.

(0) 讚！ | 太子爷

It is now 6.03, still showing "First reviewer(s) invited 20 May 2026". Does this mean that no reviewers have agreed to review yet?

(0) 讚！ | 太子爷

Yes, if the review is accepted, it will be updated, and my second day will show that one reviewer has accepted the review.

(0) 讚！ | 88Hua88

It is now 5.29 and it still shows "First reviewer(s) invited 20 May 2026". Does this mean that no reviewers have agreed to review yet?

(0) 讚！ | 太子爷

After peer review, it has been 5 days since the editor invited more than 10 reviewers. Does this mean that no reviewers have accepted the review invitation? Will it be shown if a reviewer accepts the review invitation?

(1) 讚！ | 太子爷

After submitting the manuscript, a technical review is required, and WB full membrane is needed.

(0) 讚！ | 西红柿炒番茄

May I ask how to send an email to the editor? I only found Madelyn.Marciano@springernature.com, but it seems like an editor from Springer Nature, not the editor handling the manuscript.

(0) 讚！ | FengJJ111

Do you want the WB original strip?

(0) 讚！ | jizhen cen

The first trial took 6 months, but the repair process was quick. We need the WB tape.

(1) 讚！ | bin he

The technical review was quick, the first reviewer took a month, couldn't find the second reviewer, wasted a month, and then added another reviewer, waited another 3 months. The revision time was quite generous, 3 months.

(0) 讚！ | bin he

May I ask at what stage are we now? I need this article for my graduation, and I'm in a rush.

(0) 讚！ | iqniychen

It's normal, it took me 2 months to find a reviewer, the first review took 3 months, and the second review took 4 months.

(0) 讚！ | ozx

Submitted on October 5th, peer review on October 11th, it's been a month and still haven't found a reviewer.

(0) 讚！ | 孟孟必中

Overall, the review process was very fast. I submitted the paper at the end of May and invited 10 reviewers, three of whom agreed to review it. I received feedback on July 1st, made major revisions, resubmitted on August 1st, and was accepted by the end of August. Because it was my first time submitting to an SCI journal, I was unsure of the post-acceptance process, so there was a delay before it was published online on October 2nd. Overall, I am very satisfied with the efficiency of this journal. The editors were also very good, patient, and easy to communicate with.

(0) 讚！ | 能不能接受啊求求了

The editor has invited 10 reviewers.
One reviewer has accepted to review your manuscript.
The editor has received one reviewer report. It has been a month. Should we wait for other reviewers to accept the review?

(0) 讚！ | 十三豆pxm

Will the official website display the status of "major revise"?

(0) 讚！ | HHanLL

May I ask what's happening behind?

(0) 讚！ | HHanLL

Do you need all three repeats of the WB raw data?

(0) 讚！ | 星罗棋布