Trash journal, under review for three months, nearly four months, finally received an email saying it wasn't sent for review. I'm truly fed up. I will never submit to this journal again in my life.

(1) 讚！ | 淡雅浓香

How long after the RRC, did they repair it or hire it?

(0) 讚！ | 小巷思维

Sorry to bother you, may I ask a question: when submitting a revised manuscript, can I refer to your three-column format for the Response Letter?

(0) 讚！ | 三年0006

1.19 underwent another major revision. The editor-in-chief first acknowledged the originality of the manuscript and provided 7 comments, 6 of which were supplementary to the content and formatting of the original manuscript, and one was to add an experiment. Reviewer 1 also had a question, requesting the addition of a small experiment. A total of 10 days were given for revisions.

On 1.22 afternoon, the revised manuscript was submitted again, just approved, and immediately "with editor". It may not be sent for review again.

Hoping for an acceptance!!!

(0) 讚！ | 寒石

2026 1.7 UR 5-1-1
2026 1.7 RRC 5-2-2
Currently still RRC, about to undergo judgment, as new reviewers have been invited.

(0) 讚！ | 寒石

Is the probability of rejection high after the initial review by the editorial board?

(0) 讚！ | falunwendexiaoke

Is this jcr partition a zone?

(0) 讚！ | falunwendexiaoke

Let's start a new thread, it's a bit slow with a four-month review process.
7.17 Submission
Manager's lengthy UR
11.22 RRC
11.30 DIP major revisions
Three reviewers, associate editor, two reviewers, a total of 14 comments, given three weeks 12.01-12.22
12.10 Revision, added two experiments, the rest are explanations
12.11 WE
12.11 Editor invited
12.13 UR 2-0-0
12.15 UR 2-1-0
Finally, hoping the reviewers don't bail and have a soft spot, the editor is very good and efficient
Accept!!!

(0) 讚！ | 寒石

It has been a week and I am still submitting to journals. The process has been too slow lately.

(0) 讚！ | 东南亚魔鬼筋肉人

The system displayed DIP on 11.16.
The system was updated on 11.17, but still displays DIP. I guess it's done for.

(0) 讚！ | 千寻x

On November 3rd, submit, on November 4th, make changes to the unit mailbox and other formats.
On November 5th, submit, on November 6th, wait.
On November 12th, wait, on November 13th, wait.
Hope to win!

(0) 讚！ | 千寻x

Submitted to Journal has been three days, is this normal...

(0) 讚！ | yiyi

Hello, may I ask how long you have been waiting for the first instance's feedback?

(0) 讚！ | liq123

Please accept the following paragraph for translation:

(1) 讚！ | liq123

After the first review, three reviewers provided feedback. After revisions in August, two reviewers accepted the revisions, while the other reviewer has not accepted them yet. The feedback from the other two reviewers has been in the RRC for nine days, and it is still in the RRC. It is unknown how much longer it will be in the RRC. How many days did your second review take in the RRC?

(1) 讚！ | sss555

Submission on Aug 15, 2025
Review on Aug 29, 2025

(0) 讚！ | xingyufeng

There are a total of eight charts, any additional ones can be included in the supplementary materials.

(0) 讚！ | 汐夕

Can I confirm that the number of tables and figures in the revised manuscript should not exceed 8?

(0) 讚！ | 四零

Submission on 5.20
So far, no reviewer has accepted the manuscript for review. Can I withdraw the submission? It's taking too long.

(0) 讚！ | stay’

May I ask if it has been submitted for final review?

(0) 讚！ | 东南亚魔鬼筋肉人

Very slow, submitted in February, reviewed in March, received comments in July, a total of 3 reviewers, 2 reviewers suggested minor revisions, 1 reviewer was in a hostile research field, or was a student reviewing for their supervisor, the review was not very serious, the comments were subjective, baseless, and meaningless, the editor directly rejected based on the negative comments, it is inexplicable.

(0) 讚！ | tongxxxxxx

This journal has stricter formatting requirements compared to others, with a turnaround time of around three months. After two rounds of revisions, major and minor, the manuscript was finally accepted after three rounds of peer review. The reviewers' comments were generally constructive, although some may have posed particularly challenging questions for those who are not well-versed in the subject matter.

(1) 讚！ | 汐夕

Did you submit it for review?

(0) 讚！ | dangligedang~

I'd like to ask how you set up the three-column reply in your table. After receiving the major revisions from the editor, I was also told to reply using a three-column table, but I didn't understand how to do it. Thanks for your response.

(0) 讚！ | suss

Did you submit it for review in the end?

(0) 讚！ | dangligedang~