The first submission to WR, make a note
8.27 submitted to journal
8.29 editor invited

(1) 讚！ | wozhengdshiful

May I ask how many days it usually takes for the editor to make a decision after receiving the reviewers' comments (RC)? It has been over ten days and I still haven't heard anything.

(0) 讚！ | 11jj

2025.06.12: Submitted

2025.06.16: Under Review

2025.07.20: Major revision (3 weeks for revision)

2025.07.26: Resubmitted for revision

2025.07.28: Under Review

2025.08.10: Major revision (2 weeks for revision; Reviewer 1 is satisfied, Reviewer 2 has three comments)

2025.08.11: Resubmitted for revision

2025.08.13: Under Review

2025.08.25: Accepted

The overall process went relatively smoothly. The innovation of this manuscript is significantly higher than another one I submitted at the same time. Although the reviewers provided many comments, they were generally friendly and constructive. I made sure to complete and submit revisions as quickly as possible each time, which significantly shortened the review process and ultimately led to a successful acceptance within a short period of time.

(2) 讚！ | 中国抽象院院士

The results of the first submission have not been released yet, while the second submission will be sent for review five days after it is submitted.

(1) 讚！ | 中国抽象院院士

8.12 WE
8.13 Major R
Given 21 days to revise, currently working on it, thanks to the reviewers, no major issues to address.

(0) 讚！ | 倥偬

The first round of revisions has been sent back, with the first reviewer agreeing to accept them. However, the second reviewer still has three questions, so further revisions are necessary.

(0) 讚！ | 中国抽象院院士

7.19 Review completed: 0➡️1
7.25 Invitation accepted: 1/8➡️3/15
It is hoped that two recommended reviewers will be added to the submission.

(0) 讚！ | 倥偬

Find another editor, no big deal.

(0) 讚！ | Allen

On July 21, I checked with the editor again, but I still don't understand this process.

(0) 讚！ | Sivan

The first round of feedback came back after a month, requiring a major revision. The two reviewers provided over thirty suggestions and conditions to address. Time to make some changes.

(0) 讚！ | 中国抽象院院士

Just want to complain, the level of the reviewers is too bad. They simply lack professionalism. You can tell one of the reviewers is an amateur just by looking at their comments. You would think that for such a prestigious journal, the reviewers would be very professional and knowledgeable, but the feedback is just terrible. One reviewer couldn't even understand English and pointed out 5 grammar issues that weren't actually grammatical errors. It's just a reflection of the true essence of academia - letting the most knowledgeable people research and letting the least knowledgeable people review.

(0) 讚！ | waterlili

6 Jul 2025 submit
9 Jul 2025 Invite Editor
10 Jul 2025 WE
11 Jul 2025 Under Review

(0) 讚！ | nihaojvzipi

30 Jun 2025 Submit to journal
04 Jul 2025 Editor Invited
07 Jul 2025 Editor Assigned

So slow真滴

(1) 讚！ | Wenxin Shi

6.20 submit to journal
6.23 editor invited
6.26 editor assigned
6.27 under review
6.28 Accept invitation: 0/5➡️1/5
7.4 Send invitation: 1/5➡️1/8

(0) 讚！ | 倥偬

Already submitted.

(0) 讚！ | 吴皓月

6.5 Submission
6.9 Editor Invitation
6.16 Editor Assignment
6.24 Rejection
The process may take some time.

(0) 讚！ | 科研没有SCI

Record this long period of time:
3.27 STJ
4.01 Editor invited
4.08 UR changed multiple times in the middle, with a total of 3 reviewers
5.07 Minimum number of reviews received (1 returned)
5.11 Minimum number of reviews received (3 requested), but editor only provided 2 comments
5.20 Major revision
5.29 UR
6.21 accepted
The process was agonizing, especially before R1, endured for half a month, felt uncomfortable. Although a major revision was requested, the issues were actually minor. Overall, it went relatively smoothly, wishing everyone good luck as well. Leaving this data here for reference.

(0) 讚！ | ZJU-Resdog

6.16 UR

(0) 讚！ | Sivan

Submit for review after four days, hoping for good luck!

(0) 讚！ | 中国抽象院院士

5.29 6-3-0
6.8 6-3-1
6.10 6-4-1
6.12 With editor 6-4-2
6.13 With editor

(0) 讚！ | Damonrt

Don't worry, it's only been a few days. Consider the editing time and efficiency, editors also have their own lives and things to do. I once waited almost a month from Editor invited to Editor Assigned for a minor revision, and then it was quickly accepted. It may also be processed quickly.

(0) 讚！ | chongdong

Hello, has the status remained unchanged since the editor invited on 9.27? And then it changed directly to accept on 9.30? It has been 3 days since the status changed to editor invited after my second revision submission, previously the status changed quickly from editor invited to Under Review after the first revision.

(0) 讚！ | howard88

Is the status supposed to change to "accept" after being invited by the editor on September 21, 2024, until September 26, 2024? My status also remained unchanged for 3 days after being invited by the editor following the second revision. During the first revision, the status quickly changed from "editor invited" to "under review."

(0) 讚！ | howard88

5.30 STJ
6.02 Editor invited
6.06 Editor Declined Invitation (What's going on, folks? Is this the prelude to rejection? ?)

(0) 讚！ | Sivan

0606 Editor Invited
0606 Editor Assigned

(0) 讚！ | bzdbzdbzdb