The editor gave a major revision, but mentioned that it may still be rejected in the future. There were four reviewers, two suggested minor revisions, one suggested major revisions, and one recommended rejection (acknowledging innovation but feeling that the depth was lacking). We are currently making changes, but some experiments cannot be added.

(0) 讚！ | Accpet！

Here is my recent submission experience. This paper is quite innovative, and I spent a lot of time organizing it in the early stages. The overall editing and reviewer response was very quick, with a total of 2 reviewers. After receiving the reviewer comments, I promptly addressed them and replied in a timely manner, keeping the overall process to just over 2 months.

5.25 Submitted
6.06 Editor Assigned
6.07 Under Review
6.25 With Editor
6.30 Major Revision
7.13 Resubmitted
7.15 Under Review
7.25 With Editor
7.31 Minor Revision
7.31 Resubmitted
8.03 Accept

(0) 讚！ | 浅浅and蓝蓝

It took 6 months, and the first WR was finally accepted, with the timeline placed at the end. This is the slowest submission I have made, but fortunately the result is good. The review process took 1.5 months, with 5 reviewers providing many suggestions. The editor requested major revisions with a deadline of 20 days, which was tight so I requested a one-month extension. After submitting the revised version, two reviewers provided additional comments, so I made further changes and resubmitted. The main issue was that one reviewer did not accept the review for nearly two months, causing anxiety. Eventually, I decided to try some superstition and carried a lucky charm, spent time with my family to relax, and then received the good news. The article discusses free radical photophysics, with a dynamic model and thermodynamic calculations included. Here is the link for reference: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2026.126600
1.30 Submit
2.2 With Editor
2.5 Under review
3.22 Major revision
5.9 Resubmit
6.26 Revision
6.03 Resubmit
7.29 Accept

(0) 讚！ | 乐观的反向da

I have been on vacation for 4 days and still in WE. It is said that Europe is on holiday.

(0) 讚！ | 那一年的河川

The editor said that the content of the article that was rejected before is very similar to the one being sent back. They asked me to contact the chief editor to confirm if it can be resubmitted.

(0) 讚！ | Accpet！

What does "send back" mean?

(0) 讚！ | keepthebasic

Hey, how have you been lately? Are you still working on the external audit?

(0) 讚！ | 有梦想的女博士

How long has Editor Invited been invited?

(0) 讚！ | 乘风1991

Can you tell me if this process is normal? I'm feeling anxious because I saw it changed to "With Editor" these past two days and still haven't received any results!!!

(0) 讚！ | Accpet！

Not all reviewers were only sent one review invitation for the second time (the one for major revisions).

(1) 讚！ | Bob

May I ask if all reviewers have returned their comments after major revisions for re-submission? I am currently 1/2/2, and the second reviewer has not responded yet.

(2) 讚！ | xxxyyyyC

6.29 Accept, it seems there was no RRC and DIP, and was hired directly.

(0) 讚！ | Bob

Hello, Hello, Hello, soft-hearted editor!

(0) 讚！ | 5636

3.28 STJ
4.1 WE
4.4 UR 0/1/30+
4.12 UR 0/2/30+
4.20 UR 1/2/30+
5.6 UR 1/3/30+
5.18 RCC
5.19 WE
6.8 Major Revision
6.20 WE
6.22 UR
Waiting...

(0) 讚！ | Bob

Search WeChat for: iSiwei Research Publishing Services to view specific progress.

(1) 讚！ | Loki

It has been almost two months under review.

(0) 讚！ | Loki

Congratulations first! I have submitted my manuscript for 10 days and it is still "Editor Invited". I want to ask where can I check how many reviewers have accepted or not accepted?

(0) 讚！ | 星儿

My editor invited 8 reviewers for me, but none of them accepted ?.

(0) 讚！ | 十三月.

Encountering a good editor, the processing speed is very fast, and there are not too many reviewers in the professional field. Five people were invited, and two accepted the review, meeting the minimum reviewer requirements of the journal. The main reason is that the assigned editor is very efficient. From submission to review, modification to acceptance, the editor basically processes it the next working day.

(0) 讚！ | chunxuan

The special issue has received a large number of submissions, so the review process may be slower.
26.01.29 submitted
26.02.24 under review
26.06.09 major revision
Two reviewers provided nearly 40 comments, with overall positive feedback.

(0) 讚！ | zf519

Inhale, exhale, receive good luck!

(0) 讚！ | 5636

You have been assigned, but there hasn't been any change for a week.

(0) 讚！ | XIEDONG

How long does it usually take for an Editor to be Assigned? It's been a week since I submitted, and there has been no change from Editor Invited to Editor Assigned. Is this normal?

(0) 讚！ | 洛芷江

I just submitted my article to this AI journal today. How is everyone's progress? How is the speed on the editor's side? How many days on average?

(0) 讚！ | XIEDONG

It has been almost a month since we last met.

(0) 讚！ | cheny