The magazine made the first decision in 5 days, but after waiting for two weeks, it is still with the editor. I contacted the magazine to withdraw the submission.

(0) 讚！ | wsywsy

After returning from rework on December 13th, I have not processed the edits after passing the technical review. Are you also in the same situation?

(0) 讚！ | 还是想不出名字

260109 found another reviewer, added some experiments, the results are unknown, and people are already numb.

(0) 讚！ | GaEs

How are you doing?

(0) 讚！ | 林一一

On September 22nd, it's been over 8 months now and the second external audit has been going on for nearly 3 months. Still no news. Asked the editor, they said they will inform us if there are any results, but no other information. Frustrated, but now feel unwilling to withdraw the submission. Feeling melancholic, and can't submit to this journal in the future.

(0) 讚！ | GaEs

More than 10 reviewers have been invited now, overwhelmed.

(0) 讚！ | GaEs

250711 has become, The editor has invited 4 reviewer(s)

I fell silent, wondering if my article is really worth being reviewed again and again.

(0) 讚！ | GaEs

Is there an experiment in the article?

(0) 讚！ | Xun Peng

Submitted on 25.1.16, underwent technical review, in peer review on 25.2.3; received revision comments on 25.5.29; replied to editor on 25.06.26; on 25.06.30, directly passed technical review again and entered peer review. The editor has invited 2 reviewers.

Is this normal, brothers? It's really tough to publish an article nowadays. This journal is already at 1.6... and still so difficult.

(0) 讚！ | GaEs

It's great, initially given a major overhaul with a deadline of half a month, but applied for an extension to one month. Then they were directly hired.

(0) 讚！ | dcgdc

If you're in a hurry, don't submit to this journal. It has been with the editors for two and a half months, the editorial assistant responds quickly, but the editing process is very slow.

(0) 讚！ | 有投必中中中

I'm speechless, it's been four months and it's still at the editor's.

(0) 讚！ | 太山德本

Submitted on 20230906,
Invited reviewers on 20231012,
Received major revisions on 20240416,
Submitted minor revisions on 20240502 and returned on the same day,
Accepted on 20240915, currently awaiting final editing.
There were no major changes, but it refreshed the submission record. I truly envy those who were accepted within just a few months under their real names.

(0) 讚！ | wenx333

May I ask how long it will take to receive the proof?

(0) 讚！ | 璃月雪绿

You are quite decisive in running.

(0) 讚！ | Adelaide Lawson

Can you withdraw the submission?

(0) 讚！ | 回风嘉蕊

It's been three months and it still hasn't been edited. Withdrawn submission, run for it ?

(0) 讚！ | 芙蓉桐华

Editor assignment, it's been two weeks, damn it.

(0) 讚！ | 云来俊贤

I went to check the information on Research Square again, and it was very conflicting. It showed that the article had already been submitted for review, but on the Springer page it still says "with editor." If anyone knows the reason for this, please let me know.

(0) 讚！ | 有投必中中中

I have been waiting for almost a month now, and it's still with the editor. If it's not finished by the end of the month, I will have to withdraw the submission.

(0) 讚！ | 有投必中中中

The review process is very slow, especially when it takes over a month to reach the editor. For friends in a hurry, it is best to bypass this process.

(0) 讚！ | 有投必中中中

Research focus: tumor experience sharing: Submitted for two and a half months, no editor has been assigned yet, please be cautious when submitting!

(0) 讚！ | 芙蓉桐华

How are you? It's been a long time for me too.

(0) 讚！ | 芙蓉桐华

Usually 1-2 months.

(0) 讚！ | 辉夜玄穆

Hello, how are you now? How long does peer review take?

(0) 讚！ | 佳惠酱大魔王