This magazine editor has a lot of power, and he believes that he can ignore the opinions of reviewers if he thinks you haven't done enough! This is not unprofessional. It is, in fact, a responsible behavior. If you want to evaluate the quality of a magazine based on speed, I suggest submitting to the top journal, MDPI.

(0) 讚！ | 方建

Very professional magazine, the level of reviewers and editors is very high, and their opinions are very objective. It seems to be not very popular in China, and its rating is very low.

(1) 讚！ | 方建

The review process is too slow, and the editing is not professional.

(0) 讚！ | zhuangbiwang

What kind of article did you submit, and how long did it take in total?

(0) 讚！ | anxuanxian

It may be due to different editors, but when I submitted my article for major revisions, it was accepted in less than a month after the revisions were made. Moreover, this journal has an advanced online version, which is published within 3 working days after proofreading. It is very efficient.

(0) 讚！ | 晕

Ask for recommendations from mentors or individuals related to the topic

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

As the degree of specialization in academic disciplines continues to increase, it becomes more difficult for journals to find appropriate peer reviewers. Therefore, requesting authors to recommend reviewers is a mutually beneficial practice: journals can find suitable reviewers and save time searching for them, while authors can provide support through their networks and recommend scholars who can best understand the submitted papers

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

What is a recommended reviewer/expert/peer?

(0) 讚！ | 深渊兴业

I don't know any experts, can you recommend one?

(0) 讚！ | 平原文波

The one downstairs, you can choose to withdraw your submission at any time. It doesn't matter whether it's virtuous or not. Nobody forced you to submit.

(4) 讚！ | 我是一阵风

Too slow, and the editor was not nice. He let me make minor revisions three or four times, and all three reviewers said it’s fine. But the editor just kept it in his hand and refused to reply. Over more than two months later, it was time for my degree application. I had no choice but only reminded the manuscript. However, the editor rejected it. He was really unhuman and unkind. I was not afraid that you rejected my manuscript. There is a small probability of rejection for minor revisions, but I accepted it if he rejected it. The problem was that every time reviewers’ comments were returned to the journal, the editor held it in his hands for at least one month, more than two months at most. It was delayed for more than half a year. Such an unscrupulous person will be punished sooner or later!

(10) 讚！ | 南冥氤辉

Review speed: 3.0 Experience sharing: too slow, and the editor is not good at all. After minor revisions three or four times, all three reviewers said it was good and no problem, but the editor kept holding it and not replying to me. With my degree application deadline approaching in more than two months, I had no choice but to urge the editor to make a decision. The editor rejected it, which is really inhumane and unprofessional. I'm not afraid of rejection. Rejection after minor revisions is a rare event, but I can accept it. The problem is that every time the reviewers return the article, the editor holds onto it for at least a month, and at most, over two months. I have been delayed for more than half a year. Such unethical people will eventually face consequences!

(0) 讚！ | Victoria Grey

I published one paper in 2010, and just had another one accepted recently. I submitted it on June 1st, received revisions at the end of July (reject and resubmit), got it back in mid-August, accepted it with revisions a week later, received it again at the end of August, and it was accepted 2 hours later. The peer review process was quite strict, the feedback was very constructive, and the article needed some level of innovation, with rigorous experimentation

(0) 讚！ | 东风向笛

I sent an article in 2010, and recently submitted an article that was just accepted. I submitted it on June 1st, resubmitted at the end of July, which was returned in mid-August. Ultimately, it was accepted with revision one week later. The reviews are strict; the opinions are very pertinent. The article must be original, and the experiment should be rigorous.

(1) 讚！ | Anonymous

Stuck at this juncture, it's not easy to push further, so getting over 4 points is satisfactory

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

What is the review time and speed of this journal?

(0) 讚！ | Anonymous

What is the review time and speed of this journal?

(0) 讚！ | 独孤安天

What kind of articles does this magazine include? Do you accept submissions on the interaction between nanomaterials and plants, as well as toxicology? Thank you!

(0) 讚！ | 半荷子

How long does it take to review? Can you introduce some submissions that have been made before?

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

How long is the review time for this magazine??

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

This magazine is a good magazine

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

It is very difficult to submit an article, with an impact factor of 5.4 in 2010

(0) 讚！ | 四象惜玉

submission is very difficult, 2010 impact shadow reached 5.4

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Specialization in Botany

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Research Focus: Botany

(0) 讚！ | 冬马浩奇