After my technical check, it is peer review, but the main interface only shows that my technical check has passed. Does this mean it has been submitted for review?

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄子芸

Review speed: 3.0
Research focus: cancer
Experience sharing: Submitted before Christmas, still in peer review after three months, indicating that The editors' decision can take several weeks as they may consult peer reviewers

(0) 讚！ | 仲夏和平

There shouldn't be too much personal relationships mentioned in the article, it's all talk and no substance

(0) 讚！ | 南烟小可爱

Review speed: 2.0 | Submission hit rate: 5.0
Research focus: Tumors; Sharing experience in tumor chemotherapy: It is already quite difficult to submit a molecular cancer research series article with a hard submission now. Of course, there are some low-level articles related to non-coding RNA in the journal. Although journals like Big CDD, Nature, Journal of Hepatology, Cancer Research, Advanced Science, etc., sometimes publish related articles, the quality of the articles is not much different. In this regard, I hope that the Molecular Cancer journal can make improvements

(0) 讚！ | Lucy Larkin

I have also been peer reviewing for two months, and I have received one reviewer report

(0) 讚！ | 仲夏和平

How do I know if I have invited reviewers? Did you send an email notification?

(0) 讚！ | 晔晔公子

How long have you been waiting? When did you apply?

(0) 讚！ | 晔晔公子

Is this technology peer reviewed directly after verification? But the main interface is editor-appointed. Is this how it goes for all the experts?

(0) 讚！ | 晔晔公子

I am the same way

(0) 讚！ | 飞月远航

I am two months old

(0) 讚！ | Joanne Chesterton

How long did it take for your manuscript to reach the reviewers in the end? I've been unable to find a reviewer for mine

(0) 讚！ | 金山智明

When can we expect to hear back from you?

(0) 讚！ | 金山智明

Review speed: 2.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 25.0 Experience sharing: Submitted a comprehensive review, was rejected by Nature Cancer, two months for minor revisions

(0) 讚！ | 重阳芳泽

This magazine is indeed getting more and more difficult

(0) 讚！ | 崇学小姐姐

This magazine is becoming more and more serious now

(0) 讚！ | Antony Herty

I have been in this state for a month

(0) 讚！ | Joanne Chesterton

Instant Rejection

(0) 讚！ | 上清明喆

I have one class per month

(0) 讚！ | Joanne Chesterton

Remember to come back and update your status

(0) 讚！ | 一吃就胖小红霞

Made some changes and reuploaded in return

(0) 讚！ | 上清明喆

Research focus: Tumor Biology
Experience sharing: I submitted a review article to a journal with an impact factor of 1.7, let's see how long it takes to get rejected

(0) 讚！ | 上清明喆

What happened next?

(0) 讚！ | 上清明喆

The editor has been appointed for a month now. Have you ever encountered this situation, where there are too many articles to handle?

(0) 讚！ | Joanne Chesterton

I went through 3 rounds of peer review, inviting a total of 5 reviewers. The number of invitations for each round is displayed before review invited. Once the reviewers agree, it shows as agreed. After the review is completed, it prompts for received reports, and finally, a decision is made. Now we also require uploading of raw data, and I have replied to over 100 comments, which is indeed much more rigorous than before

(0) 讚！ | 魔都吉星

Hello, could you please share the specific changes in each step? Right now, I see "4 reviewers invited"

(0) 讚！ | 金山智明