| 期刊簡介 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
期刊名稱 | Molecular Cancer LetPub Score 8.5
52 ratings
Rate
Reputation 8.6 Influence 8.3 Speed 8.7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 期刊簡稱 | MOL CANCER | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ISSN | 1476-4598 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| h-index | 103 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CiteScore |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 自引率 (2023-2024) | 2.20%自引率趨勢 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 掲載範囲 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 官方網站 | https://link.springer.com/journal/12943 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 在線稿件提交 | https://submission.nature.com/new-submission/12943/3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 開放訪問 | Yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 出版商 | BioMed Central | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 主題領域 | 医学 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 出版國/地區 | ENGLAND | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 發行頻率 | 月刊 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 創刊年 | 2002 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 每年文章數 | 292每年文章數趨勢 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 黃金OA百分比 | 100.00% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
OA Related Info![]() | APC: Yes( EUR3990; USD4890; GBP3490; ) APC waiver:Check Notes Other charges: No Keywords: oncology、tumour biology、cancer antigens Useful LinksAims & ScopeAuthor InstructionsEditorial BoardAnonymous peer review | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Web of Science 四分位 ( 2023-2024) | WOS Quartile: Q1
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 索引 (SCI or SCIE) | Science Citation Index Expanded | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 鏈接到PubMed Central (PMC) | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=1476-4598%5BISSN%5D | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 平均審稿時間 * | 來自出版商的數據: 來自作者的數據: Average 2 Month(s) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 競爭力 * | 來自作者的數據: About 50% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 參考鏈接 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| *所有的審稿過程指標,如接受率和審稿速度,僅限於用戶提交的稿件。因此,這些指標可能無法準確反映期刊的競爭力或速度。 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
| |
| 首頁 上一頁 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 下一頁 末頁 (頁 | |
| [Molecular Cancer] 的評論 | 撰寫評論 |
| 作者: 震山斯乔 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2014-06-22 18:30:59 評論於 Review speed: 3.0 | Submission hit rate: 50.0 Experience sharing: It took a little over 5 months from submission to ePUB for my article, but since I wasn't in a hurry, I thought the speed was acceptable. The specific timeline is as follows: Two weeks after the initial assessment, it moved to under review with a lengthy process. There were two reviewers, one of whom returned their comments to the editor in about a month, while the other reviewer took over two months to return their comments to the editor (I believe it was the reviewer's delay, not the editor's). After receiving the review comments, the editor asked me to revise the manuscript according to the comments within two days and gave me a month to make the revisions. After I completed the revisions, the editor asked for a second review by the reviewers, which took a little over two weeks. The editorial decision making process took four days, and finally, my article was accepted. This journal typically updates the status of your article or emails you every Monday |
| 作者: 凌霄高洁 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2014-06-11 13:45:46 評論於 How long does it take for editorial decision making? |
| 作者: 凌霄高洁 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2014-06-05 09:25:51 評論於 This magazine is too slow. It has been under review for 5 months and there is still no news. They don't even reply to letters. I don't know what the outcome will be. So frustrating! |
| 作者: 法慧语云 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2014-06-03 11:00:13 評論於 What is the situation with editorial decision making? |
| 作者: 凌霄高洁 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2014-05-13 21:59:22 評論於 This journal is too slow, it takes 3 months for review, and there is only 1 review with superficial comments on minor issues, which the editor rejected. Be cautious when submitting papers, as it wastes time |
| 作者: 凌霄高洁 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2014-05-13 16:58:55 評論於 The application has been under review for over 4 months, it's taking too long! |
| 作者: 凌霄高洁 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2014-05-07 14:30:43 評論於 The first review took half a year, fortunately there was a major revision, it was sent back for repairs three weeks ago, and is currently under re-review. How long does it take for comrades to go through the second review?? It's really a struggle, it's been almost half a year, the front lines have been drawn out for too long |
| 作者: 凌霄高洁 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2014-04-17 09:56:47 評論於 It has been 17 days since I submitted my manuscript, and it is still in the initial assessment stage. Should I send an email to inquire about the status? |
| 作者: 凌霄高洁 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2014-04-14 13:15:13 評論於 I submitted an article almost a month ago. How can I check the status of the article? |
| 作者: 凌霄高洁 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2014-04-02 21:33:40 評論於 Review speed: 1.0 Experience sharing: I submitted an article and saw on the website a month later that it had entered the "Revision requested" stage, but after a day I had not received any communication from the editor. Has anyone else experienced this situation? |
| 作者: 凌霄高洁 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2014-03-28 10:43:58 評論於 My junior colleague submitted a paper this year, which was revised more than 30 times. It only took a month for minor revisions, so the speed seems acceptable. However, I submitted mine three days ago and it is still at the initial assessment stage. I don't know how my speed compares |
| 作者: 凌霄高洁 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2014-03-27 21:50:51 評論於 Review speed: 6.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 25.0 Sharing Experience: Too slow, it's been 3 months and there's no response at all, speechless, everyone should be cautious |
| 作者: 凌霄高洁 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2014-03-25 15:39:14 評論於 Review Speed: 3.0 Experience Sharing: I submitted a manuscript and it entered "under review" after one week. But now it has been "under review" for 8 weeks. What's going on? |
| 作者: 凌霄高洁 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2014-03-18 19:21:34 評論於 Thank you for your guidance, I am indeed grateful for the opportunity to make corrections. Although I've been waiting for so long, the pressure is mounting. He only gave me one month to revise, is this considered short? I'm still considering whether to apply for more time, one month is a bit too tight! |
| 作者: 凌霄高洁 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2014-03-18 10:01:35 評論於 "... Speechless. Do not complain, after all, now it is more than five points magazine, calculated, this year seems to be retained in more than five points, make good modifications. Dragging on time for a long time may not be an external review issue, it may be their in-house editor's issue; if your revision time is relatively short, then generally no need for external review, if the time is long, it's hard to say." |
| 作者: 凌霄高洁 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2014-03-17 21:23:58 評論於 Is this magazine going to be sent for external review in the second round of revisions? Or will the editors decide directly? I've been waiting for 5 and a half months...finally got a chance to make edits |
| 作者: 凌霄高洁 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2013-12-21 14:36:12 評論於 The OB has read your article and it seems like it could be submitted to a better magazine |
| 作者: 凌霄高洁 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2013-12-10 22:42:46 評論於 Editorial speed: 1.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 50.0 Experience sharing: Great journal! Submitted on 9.23, accepted on 12.5, published on 12.9, very fast. The only downside is that the page fee is a bit expensive |
| 作者: 凌霄高洁 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2013-12-10 14:37:17 評論於 How long did your initial assessment downstairs last? It's been 2 months and I still haven't entered under review. What's going on? Thanks |
| 作者: 凌霄高洁 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2013-12-10 12:48:09 評論於 Thank you, it seems like I am just a tragedy |
| 作者: 凌霄高洁 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2013-12-10 08:48:33 評論於 Hello! My application has been under review for 2 weeks, and it is expected to take 4 weeks to complete. I could send an email to inquire about the progress, but I believe it may not be processed quickly as Christmas is approaching |
| 作者: 凌霄高洁 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2013-11-23 20:32:35 評論於 It's been 15 days since one month...still initial assessment...what should I do? Should I send an email? I'm seeking advice from experts |
| 作者: 凌霄高洁 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2013-11-14 18:26:59 評論於 Your sister, it's been 5 days and it's still the initial assessment. . . I regret it, damn |
| 作者: 破戒慧月 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2012-07-16 19:59:55 評論於 Review speed: 2.0 | Submission success rate: 50.0 Experience sharing: A journal with an impact factor of around 4, once calculated an IF value of over 5 in 2008. I submitted an article, but didn't hear back from the editor. After sending a few emails, I received a revised version from the editor 35 days after submission, without sending it out for review. I was asked to address a few issues, including some text modifications and additional experiments. After revising and resubmitting, it took about a month for a revision. The subsequent revisions were relatively quick, with a minor revision requested after 2 weeks, needing text modifications and answering questions. Two days after the final revision, my article was accepted. I immediately published it online after rechecking the contents |
| 作者: 凌霄高洁 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2011-08-19 19:59:06 評論於 Please be cautious when submitting to this magazine, my submission has been sitting there for a whole 2 months without any response. Sigh |
| 首頁 上一頁 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 下一頁 末頁 (頁 | |
Contact us